-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
perf: improve extend_sorted_vec & batch write hashed_state #19990
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
duyquang6
wants to merge
3
commits into
paradigmxyz:main
Choose a base branch
from
duyquang6:push-rsnqslrrpszs
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The previous implementation was specifically designed to avoid having to do a big collect like this; the resulting memory allocation from this collect dwarfs any ostensible speedup you get from not having to sort. I just did a bench comparing your implementation to the previous and this new one is about 2x slower for synthetic datasets:
You can see the bench here if you're curious
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
very useful bench @mediocregopher
when I first use old version with aggregated hashed state to bench, the result is not good. This is why I think there something wrong with
extend_reforextend_sorted_vecwhen I use your bench compare with custom own merge version (not used merge_join_by), it only shine at other target size smaller than other size, but overall case, old version still win. That give me some hint to use this function better, is keep target size and other size similar or larger so might benefit old version
shine case (new better)

but overall (size similar or target size > other) old still better

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I dump the raw data of
HashedPostStateSortedwhen bench with native-transferhere is bench result of
extend_ref, new version of both is better than in this testcasecan double check the bench here - already attach hashed state raw data
Could be raw data might have properties that benchmark doesn’t fully cover 🤔 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@duyquang6 these are interesting results, your benches for
extend_sorted_vec_comparison/t10_o1000conflict with what I originally saw in mine, but now I'm able to replicate, so there's some inconsistency there that I still need to figure out.If yours is faster for t10_o1000 I expect it's because it's doing the full allocation up-front, whereas mine is likely doing two larger allocations at the end with the
extendcalls.What do you think about trying out something like:
This way maybe we better cover all cases.