Add Tessl change review workflow - #183
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
tessl change review:
Reviewed against skills: review-code-legibility, review-test-risk, review-security-risks
review-code-legibility
- Found 1 issue; overall, the workflow reads clearly but the publisher blurs one accepted comment shape.
review-test-risk
- Found 2 issues; overall, new executable review automation is not covered by the existing Python-only CI.
review-security-risks
- Found 2 issues; privileged review publishing trusts PR-generated data too broadly.
To trigger a re-review write a comment that says @tessl-change-review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 2 files
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Re-trigger cubic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 4 files (changes from recent commits).
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Re-trigger cubic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 4 files (changes from recent commits).
Tip: Review your code locally with the cubic CLI to iterate faster.
Re-trigger cubic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 1 file (changes from recent commits).
Tip: Review your code locally with the cubic CLI to iterate faster.
Re-trigger cubic
Summary
@tessl-change-reviewtesslio/setup-tesslto an immutable commitValidation
node --check .github/change-review/publish-review.mjsnode --test .github/change-review/publish-review.test.mjspython3 -m unittest discover -s tests -vpython3 -m py_compile sbom-vm.py generate-test-images.pyThe required
TESSL_TOKENActions secret is configured.