RFC: Portolan as a pure STAC profile (v0.2.0) — thin index, derived capabilities, no Portolan extension#642
RFC: Portolan as a pure STAC profile (v0.2.0) — thin index, derived capabilities, no Portolan extension#642jatorre wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Add ADR-0057 + spec/rfc/pure-profile-v0.2.0/ (RFC, draft conformance.md & capabilities.md, and a validated reference example set). Proposal only; no canonical spec files are rewritten. See ADR-0057 for the summary.
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
RFC / discussion PR — not for merge as-is
Proposal to converge Portolan on "STAC as a thin index" after the 2026-07-09 workshop.
This PR adds only a proposal — it does not rewrite any canonical
spec/file:context/shared/adr/0057-portolan-pure-profile.md— the decision record (Status: Proposed)spec/rfc/pure-profile-v0.2.0/— the full RFC, draftconformance.md+capabilities.md, and avalidated, STAC-Browser-rendered reference example set (
buildingssingle-table +cadastremulti-table model with OSI semantics)
The gist
conformsTo; capabilities derived, not declared (contract per capability).portolan:geospatial;bboxis uniformly an AOI.AGENTS.md+README.mdreplacellms.txt(supersedes ADR-0052).Evidence
stac-node-validatorv2.0.0-rc.3 → 3/3 pass (all extensions incl. proposedosi:relations);renders in STAC Browser v5.0.0-rc.1.
Asks
versions.jsoncore vs capability · format allowlist · per-collection docs).