Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: Card expiration date placeholder update #1106

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: Card expiration date placeholder update #1106

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

borisprimer
Copy link
Contributor

@borisprimer borisprimer requested a review from NQuinn27 February 5, 2025 14:40
@borisprimer borisprimer self-assigned this Feb 5, 2025
@borisprimer borisprimer requested a review from a team as a code owner February 5, 2025 14:40
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Warnings
⚠️ This PR doesn't seem to contain any updated Unit Test 🤔. Please consider double checking it.🙏
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)
⚠️

Sources/PrimerSDK/Classes/Core/Constants/Strings.swift#L1251 - Types should be nested at most 1 level deep (nesting)

Generated by 🚫 Danger Swift against 4923e6d

@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Appetize link: https://appetize.io/app/ltvroqgpthkh73ksb7lavq3nm4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@NQuinn27 NQuinn27 NQuinn27 approved these changes

Assignees

@borisprimer borisprimer

Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@borisprimer @NQuinn27 @primer-security-integrations @BorisNikolic