Skip to content

Conversation

@campospinto
Copy link
Collaborator

The PR #156 defined domain coordinates with real=True argument. This is probably justified but requires additional testing as it breaks some calls to TerminalExpr. Here this change is reverted, and a dedicated PR will be reopened later.

@campospinto campospinto self-assigned this Jul 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@e-moral-sanchez e-moral-sanchez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. I will take a look at this later on. Thanks!

@yguclu
Copy link
Member

yguclu commented Aug 1, 2024

@campospinto @e-moral-sanchez What is the current status on this matter? Is there an open issue?

@campospinto
Copy link
Collaborator Author

campospinto commented Aug 2, 2024

@campospinto @e-moral-sanchez What is the current status on this matter? Is there an open issue?

I don't think so, but it would be good indeed to have one that describes precisely the problem.

Note that the previous PR #156 was breaking some calls to TerminalExpr of derivatives (returning zeros for non-constant functions), probably because the coordinate symbols were not properly identified. Some of the corresponding code is now tested in the (still open) PR #161, so that the problem can be detected at sympde level.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants