Skip to content

docs: refresh GAP-ANALYSIS + COMPARISON against 0.5.0.dev0 surface#257

Merged
prakashUXtech merged 1 commit into
devfrom
docs/refresh-gap-analysis-and-comparison-0.5
May 26, 2026
Merged

docs: refresh GAP-ANALYSIS + COMPARISON against 0.5.0.dev0 surface#257
prakashUXtech merged 1 commit into
devfrom
docs/refresh-gap-analysis-and-comparison-0.5

Conversation

@prakashUXtech
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Both docs/GAP-ANALYSIS.md and docs/COMPARISON.md were March 2026 vintage and scored against the 0.2.2 baseline. Most of what they listed as missing has since shipped — the 0.3.x spec/runtime split, the 0.4.0 identity bundle (multi-user souls, open-string layers + domain isolation, trust chain), and the 0.5.0.dev0 wave (memory update primitives, soul-aware evals, autonomous optimize, graph traversal + typed ontology, dedup-aware writes, trust-chain hardening). The docs needed a rewrite to match.

GAP-ANALYSIS.md

Restructured around what a reader actually wants to know today.

  • Status header pins the doc to 0.5.0.dev0 and SPEC 0.4.0.
  • Section 2 lists shipped capabilities with a since column. Identity / access control, trust chain (with all the 0.5.0.dev0 hardening — timestamp monotonicity, strict canonical JSON, key rotation allow-list, payload summaries, structured logging, touch-time pruning), memory primitives (confirm / update / supersede / forget / purge / reinstate, note()), graph traversal + typed ontology, evals / optimize / diff, journal + decision traces, CLI / MCP surface, doc surface.
  • Section 3 names real gaps verified against current code: mock-only IPFS / Arweave / blockchain providers, no vector DB store adapters, no persistent graph backends, conformance suite still pending, no streaming wire protocol, no mobile / browser runtime, no HSM custody, no soul rotate-keys CLI yet, full trust-chain archive deferred to 0.5.x.
  • Section 4 separates intentional deferrals (orchestration moved out to pocketpaw in 0.3.3; framework adapters explicitly out-of-scope).
  • Track-by-track summary maps each lane to its next likely step.

COMPARISON.md

Refreshed the head-to-head against Mem0, MemGPT / Letta, LangChain Memory, Cognee, OpenAI Memory.

  • Status header pins the doc to 0.5.0.dev0; notes competitor claims reflect each project's latest stable release.
  • Feature matrix gains rows for trust chain, multi-user attribution, domain isolation, memory update verbs, dedup-aware writes, typed graph ontology, soul-aware evals, autonomous optimization, structured diff, journal + decision traces, MCP server.
  • Per-competitor sections refreshed: what soul-protocol adds since 0.4/0.5, and — honestly — what each competitor still does better. Mem0 keeps the mature vector store ecosystem and managed cloud. Letta owns context-window paging. LangChain wins on framework breadth. Cognee wins on persistent graph DB backends. OpenAI Memory wins on zero-config.
  • Benchmark snapshot preserved but flagged as predating the 0.5 surface — re-run planned when 0.5.0 tags.

Test plan

Notes

  • Targeting dev because the new content describes 0.5.0.dev0 features that only exist on dev (main is still at 0.4.0). Doc will land on main with the next release cut.

The previous versions (2026-03) scored soul-protocol against the 0.2.2
vision baseline and a 2026-03-08 head-to-head. Most of what they listed
as missing has shipped through 0.3.x (spec/runtime split, journal,
decision traces, retrieval vocabulary), 0.4.0 (multi-user souls, open-
string layers + domain isolation, trust chain), and 0.5.0.dev0 (memory
update primitives, soul-aware evals, autonomous optimize, graph
traversal + typed ontology, dedup-aware writes, trust-chain hardening).

GAP-ANALYSIS.md now reads as "what's actually missing today" rather
than "what's missing from the 0.2.2 vision":

- Status header pinning to 0.5.0.dev0
- Section 2 lists shipped capabilities with a `since` column grounded
  in CHANGELOG + src/
- Section 3 names real gaps (mock-only eternal providers, no vector DB
  backends, no persistent graph backend, no conformance suite yet, no
  streaming sync, no mobile / browser runtime)
- Section 4 separates intentional deferrals (orchestration moved to
  pocketpaw in 0.3.3, framework adapters as out-of-scope)
- Track-by-track summary maps each lane to next likely step

COMPARISON.md adds the dimensions 0.4/0.5 introduced — trust chain,
multi-user attribution + domain isolation, soul-aware evals, autonomous
optimization, graph traversal + typed ontology, dedup-aware writes —
and refreshes the prose for each competitor. The benchmark snapshot is
preserved but flagged as predating the 0.5 surface; the "where each
competitor wins" rows stay honest (Mem0's vector ecosystem, Letta's
context-window paging, LangChain's framework breadth, Cognee's
persistent graph DB, OpenAI Memory's zero-config).

Test plan: read each section against CHANGELOG and src/ to verify every
shipped claim points at a real PR or file, and every gap was confirmed
by current code rather than copied from the old doc.
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Issues (must fix)

  • No evidence of local testing found. Please include terminal output or screenshots.

Heads up

  • Large PR detected (882 lines across 2 files). Consider splitting into smaller PRs.

Please update your PR to address these points.

@prakashUXtech prakashUXtech merged commit 3b5777f into dev May 26, 2026
2 checks passed
@prakashUXtech prakashUXtech deleted the docs/refresh-gap-analysis-and-comparison-0.5 branch May 26, 2026 02:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant