Skip to content

Tighten SERVE_FILE regex to prevent generic createReadStream false positives - #44

Open
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-upload-security-serve-fps-4019915604445840177
Open

Tighten SERVE_FILE regex to prevent generic createReadStream false positives#44
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-upload-security-serve-fps-4019915604445840177

Conversation

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What

Tightened the SERVE_FILE regex in src/websec_validator/extractors/upload_security.py to eliminate false positives for generic file reading calls (createReadStream, \.getObject\() that were not piped to an HTTP response sink.

Why

The old regex was too broad and flagged internal, benign uses of fs.createReadStream and s3.getObject(...) in Node.js/AWS backend code, leading to incorrect serve-no-nosniff alerts (false positives) when those files weren't even served to clients. By explicitly requiring a sink connection, e.g., .pipe(res), or checking for sink methods directly (res.sendFile, proxyMedia), we drastically reduce noise without impacting true positives.

Risk

Low. Zero true positive tests regressed. 4 regression tests added to tests/test_pentest_regressions.py under FalsePositiveRegressionTests. docguard guard remains perfectly clean.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 4019915604445840177 started by @raccioly

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants