Mike Sync v2 review - #128
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated-Upstream-Mike-Sync: true
Upstream-Risk: none
Summary
No code was recorded because the bounded candidate attempt needs new evidence before it is retried.
Capability classifications
durable Word review workflow— Potentially useful, but normalized edit storage, authenticated routes, migrations, RLS, and document mutation semantics require human decisions and exceed the low-risk queue.large-change PRD intake— A lightweight issue template is low-risk repository documentation. The adapted version is ROSS-specific and makes boundary impacts explicit without changing governed controls.account confirmation and recovery— ROSS already has forgot/reset-password screens, recovery documentation, callback configuration guidance, and confirmed-email requirements. Authentication and schema changes are also outside this queue.accessible shared UI primitives— The accessibility capability is useful, but the patch is omitted and the broad refactor cannot be assessed or reconstructed safely from metadata.additional model router— A new provider, user keys, migration, model catalogue, and outbound data path require security, governance, and architecture decisions and are prohibited from this queue.DOCX text-value fidelity— Preserving numeric-looking Word text is useful, but current ROSS lacks the upstream test file; a focused synthetic harness must establish behavior before changing document-processing semantics.Safety
This is a ready state-only synchronization pull request. Mike Sync v2 applies at most one low-risk implementation candidate per branch. Exact-head Baseline, bounded repair, review, draft, mergeability, and release controls remain authoritative.