Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(rattler): enable strict channel priority for builds #18358

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: branch-25.06
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gforsyth
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR enables strict channel priority for building conda packages with rattler-build.

The other change is removing the rapids-configure-conda-channels call since
rattler-build isn't influenced by .condarc files.

xref rapidsai/build-planning#84

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@gforsyth gforsyth requested a review from a team as a code owner March 24, 2025 16:13
@gforsyth gforsyth requested a review from jameslamb March 24, 2025 16:13
@gforsyth gforsyth added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Mar 24, 2025
@gforsyth gforsyth marked this pull request as draft March 24, 2025 16:35
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@gforsyth gforsyth removed the request for review from jameslamb March 24, 2025 16:35
@bdice
Copy link
Contributor

bdice commented Mar 31, 2025

This is waiting for rapidsai/gha-tools#153, which is waiting until after the 25.04 release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants