chore: one more check for null #602
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Walkthrough此次更改在 Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/ref.ts (1)
39-42: 空值检查的实现看起来不错！对
nodeOrComponent的空值检查放在函数开头是个很好的防御性编程实践。不过建议考虑使用更明确的条件检查：- if (!nodeOrComponent) { + if (nodeOrComponent === null || nodeOrComponent === undefined) {这样可以更清晰地表达代码意图，避免将其他假值（如
0或空字符串）也误判为无效输入。tests/ref.test.tsx (1)
181-184: 建议扩展测试用例覆盖范围当前的测试用例仅验证了
null值的情况。建议添加更多测试用例来覆盖其他可能的假值情况：it('skip null', () => { expect(supportRef(null)).toBeFalsy(); + expect(supportRef(undefined)).toBeFalsy(); }); +it('should handle other falsy values correctly', () => { + // 这些值不应该被视为无效输入 + expect(supportRef(0)).toBeTruthy(); + expect(supportRef('')).toBeTruthy(); + expect(supportRef(false)).toBeTruthy(); +});
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #602 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.78% 89.80% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 40 40
Lines 979 981 +2
Branches 320 321 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 879 881 +2
Misses 97 97
Partials 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit
新功能
supportRef函数的错误处理，添加了对假值的检查。getNodeRef函数的返回类型，以提高类型安全性。测试
supportRef的测试中新增了处理null的测试用例。