feat: add preserve empty array option #148
Conversation
test/index.test.ts
Outdated
| test('should not remove empty arrays when preserveEmptyArray is true', () => { | ||
| expect(removeUndefinedObjects({ value: [] }, { preserveEmptyArray: true })).toStrictEqual({ value: [] }); | ||
| expect(removeUndefinedObjects({ value: [undefined] }, { preserveEmptyArray: true })).toStrictEqual({ value: [] }); | ||
| expect(removeUndefinedObjects({ value: [null] }, { preserveEmptyArray: true })).toStrictEqual({ value: [] }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you add another case in here for an array with non-falsy values to assert that it is left alone. Also can you add some more examples for arrays in a nested object?
|
Can you also update the README for this new option? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
echoing @erunion's feedback here on the test coverage and README docs, otherwise LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i believe tests are failing due to my changes in #150, sorry about that 😅 mind fixing that up? running npm run prettier locally should do the trick!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i'm happy with this, will defer to @erunion for final approval + merge!
README.md
Outdated
| import removeUndefinedObjects from 'remove-undefined-objects'; | ||
|
|
||
| console.log( | ||
| removeUndefinedObjects({ key1: [], key2: [undefined], key3: { key4: 'a', key5: [] } }, { preserveEmptyArray: true }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
similar comment to here — can you add another example that's using the exact same object but with preserveEmptyArray set to false so it illustrates the difference?
|
Published to v7.0.0 |
🧰 Changes
oasrepopreserveEmptyArrayoption & separate logic to check if the current value in an object is an array.🧬 QA & Testing
preserveEmptyArrayin the removalOptions & pass in an object that has empty arrays, or arrays that contain undefined & null values