Refactoring log format by removing metadata addition in log statements.

[AmarnatReddy]

Description

Refactoring log format by removing metadata addition in log statements.

Older Log format :
2024-11-13 01:20:29,417 (cephci.utility.xunit) [INFO] - cephci.run.py:504 - RPM Compose source - https://s3.upshift.redhat.com/ceph-composes/RHCEPH-8.0-RHEL-9-20241030.0/RHCEPH-8.0-RHEL-9-20241030.0.repo

New log Format:
2024-11-13 13:46:47,424 (root) [INFO] run - [Thread MainThread] - run:504 - RPM Compose source - https://s3.upshift.redhat.com/ceph-composes/RHCEPH-8.0-RHEL-9-20241030.0/RHCEPH-8.0-RHEL-9-20241030.0.repo

The new format includes thread information, making it easier to identify logs from specific threads when multithreading is in use. If threads are named, the thread name will be displayed in the format [Thread <thread_name>]. This enhancement improves log readability in concurrent executions.

Please include Automation development guidelines. Source of Test case - New Feature/Regression Test/Close loop of customer BZs

click to expand checklist

• Create a test case in Polarion reviewed and approved.
• Create a design/automation approach doc. Optional for tests with similar tests already automated.
• Review the automation design
• Implement the test script and perform test runs
• Submit PR for code review and approve
• Update Polarion Test with Automation script details and update automation fields
• If automation is part of Close loop, update BZ flag qe-test_coverage “+” and link Polarion test

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AmarnatReddy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[psathyan]

@AmarnatReddy thanks for taking the initiative on fixing the logging.

if I understand correctly, we decided to remove this entire file.

[psathyan]

Thanks @AmarnatReddy for the explanation.

This is good approach and the modification effort is minimal. Let's evaluate parallel.

if it is working, we should be able to get this merged.