RC: Active-Active improvments #2299
Conversation
|
|
||
| {{<image filename="images/rc/subscription-add-region-throughput.png" alt="The Throughput step." >}} | ||
|
|
||
| You can also select **Set throughput as existing region** to duplicate the throughput settings from an existing region. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not major, but maybe this line would look better above the image? It's a big image with a lot of white background, so this text looks more connected to the list item below.
|
|
||
| {{<image filename="images/rc/subscription-add-region-required-resources.png" alt="The Required resources step." >}} | ||
|
|
||
| Select **Continue** to add the region to your Active-Active deployment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Separate list item, maybe? (Same issue as with the previous comment.)
| However, writes at times t4 and t6 are not concurrent as a sync happened | ||
| in between. | ||
|
|
||
| | **Time** | **CRDB Instance1** | **CRDB Instance2** | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a thought - do you think this might work well as a sequence diagram?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably. I don't want to make that change without buy-in from @rrelledge since this appears in both the Redis Cloud and Redis Software docs, and might be slightly out of scope for this PR specifically.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sequence diagrams probably would be better than the current (very old) tables, but I think maybe that could be handled in a separate ticket/PR so that it doesn't block merging this one.
Co-authored-by: andy-stark-redis <[email protected]>
Section link:
https://redis.io/docs/staging/rc-active-active/operate/rc/databases/active-active/