Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clarification on SDID as a local identifer #85

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

clarification on SDID as a local identifer #85

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

rsahita
Copy link
Collaborator

@rsahita rsahita commented Oct 1, 2024

to address issue #76

chapter3.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chapter3.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Ravi Sahita <[email protected]>
chapter3.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
chapter3.adoc Outdated
unique only to a hart, hence, SDID must not be used to tag downstream
transactions that are globally visible - implementations may map the SDID from
the initiator to other (global) identifiers but that mapping is
implementation-specific and out of scope of this specification.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could remove the "implementations may ...." - don't need to suggest an implementation specific thing. Implementations are of course free to do whatever they need but the architecture may not want to encourage that.

Co-authored-by: Samuel Holland <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Sahita <[email protected]>
@rsahita rsahita merged commit 3cedc12 into main Oct 3, 2024
1 check passed
@rsahita rsahita deleted the issue/76 branch October 3, 2024 03:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants