Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow passing an iterable to splice_children #165

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

michaelvanstraten
Copy link

Should reduce two allocation when splicing children.

Copy link
Member

@lnicola lnicola left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you also bump the crate version number? I guess this isn't a breaking change.

@michaelvanstraten michaelvanstraten force-pushed the allow-passing-an-iterable-to-splice-children branch from e442c37 to faee543 Compare August 18, 2024 17:35
@michaelvanstraten
Copy link
Author

@lnicola, sorry for the delay, I've bumped the version number.

@milianw
Copy link
Contributor

milianw commented Oct 28, 2024

@Veykril can you also review and merge this? I assume bumping the crate version would also have been required for my PR, so getting this in here instead would solve this too.

@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Oct 28, 2024

This needs a minor version bump, the signature change here could break callers

@michaelvanstraten
Copy link
Author

michaelvanstraten commented Oct 28, 2024

This needs a minor version bump, the signature change here could break callers

Yes, you are right, for somebody passing an induced type via collect this would be a breaking change since the type can no longer be induced.

@michaelvanstraten michaelvanstraten force-pushed the allow-passing-an-iterable-to-splice-children branch from faee543 to dc1eb13 Compare November 1, 2024 18:50
@michaelvanstraten
Copy link
Author

@Veykril is updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants