-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
Add "Optimizing Build Performance" section to the Cargo book #15924
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
7b6d35f
79f56d5
5940262
97ec21d
df7e02d
5c1631c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ | ||
# Optimizing Build Performance | ||
|
||
Cargo configuration options and source code organization patterns can help improve build performance, by prioritizing it over other aspects which may not be as important for your circumstances. | ||
|
||
Same as when optimizing runtime performance, be sure to measure these changes against the workflows you actually care about, as we provide general guidelines and your circumstances may be different, it is possible that some of these approaches might actually make build performance worse for your use-case. | ||
|
||
Example workflows to consider include: | ||
- Compiler feedback as you develop (`cargo check` after making a code change) | ||
- Test feedback as you develop (`cargo test` after making a code change) | ||
- CI builds | ||
|
||
## Cargo and Compiler Configuration | ||
Kobzol marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
Cargo uses configuration defaults that try to balance several aspects, including debuggability, runtime performance, build performance, binary size and others. This section describes several approaches for changing these defaults that should be designed to maximize build performance. | ||
|
||
You can set the described options either in the [`Cargo.toml` manifest](../reference/profiles.md), which will make them available for all developers who work on the given crate/project, or in the [`config.toml` configuration file](../reference/config.md), where you can apply them only for you or even globally for all your local projects. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is misleading:
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Your second point is also raised at #15924 (comment). I figured we could wait and evolve as this continues. As for the first, that is true, but since all we are talking about is profile so far, there is no point in putting that in a committed See also #15924 (comment) |
||
|
||
### Reduce amount of generated debug information | ||
|
||
Recommendation: Add to your `Cargo.toml` or `.cargo/config.toml`: | ||
|
||
```toml | ||
[profile.dev] | ||
debug = "line-tables-only" | ||
|
||
[profile.dev.package."*"] | ||
debug = false | ||
|
||
[profile.debugging] | ||
inherits = "dev" | ||
debug = true | ||
``` | ||
|
||
This will: | ||
- Change the [`dev` profile](../reference/profiles.md#dev) (default for development commands) to: | ||
- Limit [debug information](../reference/profiles.md#debug) for workspace members to what is needed for useful panic backtraces | ||
- Avoid generating any debug information for dependencies | ||
- Provide an opt-in for when debugging via [`--profile debugging`](../reference/profiles.md#custom-profiles) | ||
|
||
Trade-offs: | ||
- ✅ Faster build times | ||
- ✅ Faster link times | ||
- ✅ Smaller disk usage of the `target` directory | ||
- ❌ Requires a full rebuild to have a high-quality debugger experience | ||
|
||
### Use an alternative codegen backend | ||
|
||
Recommendation: | ||
|
||
- Install the Cranelift codegen backend rustup component | ||
```console | ||
$ rustup component add rustc-codegen-cranelift-preview --toolchain nightly | ||
``` | ||
- Add to your `Cargo.toml` or `.cargo/config.toml`: | ||
```toml | ||
[profile.dev] | ||
codegen-backend = "cranelift" | ||
``` | ||
- Run Cargo with `-Z codegen-backend` or enable the [`codegen-backend`](../reference/unstable.md#codegen-backend) feature in `.cargo/config.toml`. | ||
- This is required because this is currently an unstable feature. | ||
|
||
This will change the [`dev` profile](../reference/profiles.md#dev) to use the [Cranelift codegen backend](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift) for generating machine code, instead of the default LLVM backend. The Cranelift backend should generate code faster than LLVM, which should result in improved build performance. | ||
|
||
Trade-offs: | ||
- ✅ Faster code generation (`cargo build`) | ||
- ❌ **Requires using nightly Rust and an unstable Cargo feature** | ||
- ❌ Worse runtime performance of the generated code | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It might be worth mentioning in some way that you can mix codegen backends, by using llvm for dependencies which are often more performance critical and cranelift only for your own crate. Example from bevy subsecond plugin recommendations [profile.dev]
codegen-backend = "cranelift"
debug = false
# Consider compiling deps with cranelift if you want cold-compilation to be faster
[profile.dev.package."*"]
codegen-backend = "llvm" Another facet of runtime performance: In my experience, cranelift is only slower by a very negligible amount with opt-level=3 vs opt-level=1, which also helps alleviate runtime performance issues. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Like we do for |
||
- Speeds up build part of `cargo test`, but might increase its test execution part | ||
- ❌ Only available for [certain targets](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift?tab=readme-ov-file#platform-support) | ||
- ❌ Might not support all Rust features (e.g. unwinding) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have some "tips" at https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/timings.html, should we switch that to a link to this page?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or maybe fold that page into this one and setup a redirect
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to include a "how to profile my builds" in this page, which could link to the timings page as one of the points. And the timings page could then cross-link here for "how to optimize build perf.".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was considering bringing up dividing this into two sections
--timings
, compiler passes, macro lines,cargo llvm-lines
)I was just split on that vs framing those in terms of the current organization. For example, we could have a section on reducing the impact of generics and talk through using
cargo llvm-lines
to find large, repeated generic functions and discuss how to improve that.