WIP: Replacing RawTable with HashTable internally
#666
+471
−253
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
clarfonthey
force-pushed
the
cooking
branch
2 times, most recently
from
457d212 to
c4e775b
Compare
This was referenced Nov 29, 2025
clarfonthey
force-pushed
the
cooking
branch
3 times, most recently
from
5a45220 to
83ea0db
Compare
clarfonthey
force-pushed
the
cooking
branch
13 times, most recently
from
64e8d9c to
9c27dca
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is marked as WIP because this is not finished, both because this probably results in more IR bloat, and because most of the code simply just accesses the
rawfield of theHashTabledirectly.The goal here is to mostly keep this PR open so that folks can see what is currently possible and what methods are missing, mostly as a demonstration tool and indication of progress.