hygiene: Rename semi-transparent to semi-opaque #139084
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @davidtwco rustbot has assigned @davidtwco. Use |
rustbot
added
A-attributes
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
The former is just too long, see the examples in `hygiene.rs`
petrochenkov
force-pushed
the
transpaque
branch
from
6cd89f0 to
54bb849
Compare
davidtwco
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2025
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2025
hygiene: Rename semi-transparent to semi-opaque "Semi-transparent" is just too damn long for a name, especially when used multiple times on a single line, it bothered me when working on rust-lang#139083. An optimist sees a macro as semi-opaque, a pessimist sees it as semi-transparent. Or is it the other way round?
This was referenced Apr 16, 2025
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#139084 (hygiene: Rename semi-transparent to semi-opaque) - rust-lang#139236 (Use a session counter to make anon dep nodes unique) - rust-lang#139650 (Fix `register_group_alias` for tools) - rust-lang#139770 (Rename `LifetimeName` as `LifetimeKind`.) - rust-lang#139846 (Remove `kw::Empty` uses in rustdoc) - rust-lang#139891 (Include optional dso_local marker for functions in `enum-match.rs`) - rust-lang#139908 (parser: Remove old diagnostic notes for type ascription syntax) - rust-lang#139917 (fix for multiple `#[repr(align(N))]` on functions) Failed merges: - rust-lang#139615 (Remove `name_or_empty`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139084 - petrochenkov:transpaque, r=davidtwco hygiene: Rename semi-transparent to semi-opaque "Semi-transparent" is just too damn long for a name, especially when used multiple times on a single line, it bothered me when working on rust-lang#139083. An optimist sees a macro as semi-opaque, a pessimist sees it as semi-transparent. Or is it the other way round?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
"Semi-transparent" is just too damn long for a name, especially when used multiple times on a single line, it bothered me when working on #139083.
An optimist sees a macro as semi-opaque, a pessimist sees it as semi-transparent.
Or is it the other way round?