-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
Remove tidy checks for tests/ui/issues/
#144173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
There are changes to the cc @jieyouxu
|
issues.txt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't leave commented out code, just delete it.
Once that work is complete, we won't need this check (there were way too many tests under |
da05401
to
3720916
Compare
spellcheck is broken for other reasons, u can ignore. |
Should be fine now, only reason I need tidy to ignore deleted I will remove all moved tests from |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #144181) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Can you rebless @rustbot author |
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use |
With keeping removing this checks? |
My understanding of the intention is that:
|
@rustbot ready deleted all lines that starts with reverted this filter on rust/src/tools/tidy/src/ui_tests.rs Line 78 in bcaa795
but kept this, because otherwise it's threw errors about existed tests rust/src/tools/tidy/src/ui_tests.rs Lines 133 to 134 in bcaa795
|
issues.txt
tests/ui/issues/
tests/ui/issues/
tests/ui/issues/
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? `@jieyouxu` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ``@jieyouxu`` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ```@jieyouxu``` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7) - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId) - #144272 (resolve: Make disambiguators for underscore bindings module-local (take 2)) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ````@jieyouxu```` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? `````@jieyouxu````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ``````@jieyouxu`````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ```````@jieyouxu``````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ````````@jieyouxu```````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`) - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7) - #144239 (Clean `rustc/parse/src/lexer` to improve maintainability) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId) - #144290 (update tests/ui/SUMMARY.md) - #144292 (mbe: Use concrete type for `get_unused_rule`) - #144298 (coverage: Enlarge empty spans during MIR instrumentation, not codegen) - #144311 (Add powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl to CI rustc targets) - #144315 (bootstrap: add package.json and package-lock.json to dist tarball) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? `````````@jieyouxu````````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`) - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7) - #144239 (Clean `rustc/parse/src/lexer` to improve maintainability) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId) - #144290 (update tests/ui/SUMMARY.md) - #144292 (mbe: Use concrete type for `get_unused_rule`) - #144298 (coverage: Enlarge empty spans during MIR instrumentation, not codegen) - #144311 (Add powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl to CI rustc targets) - #144315 (bootstrap: add package.json and package-lock.json to dist tarball) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #144173 (Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/`) - #144234 (Fix broken TLS destructors on 32-bit win7) - #144239 (Clean `rustc/parse/src/lexer` to improve maintainability) - #144256 (Don't ICE on non-TypeId metadata within TypeId) - #144290 (update tests/ui/SUMMARY.md) - #144292 (mbe: Use concrete type for `get_unused_rule`) - #144298 (coverage: Enlarge empty spans during MIR instrumentation, not codegen) - #144311 (Add powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl to CI rustc targets) - #144315 (bootstrap: add package.json and package-lock.json to dist tarball) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of #144173 - Kivooeo:tidy_checks, r=jieyouxu Remove tidy checks for `tests/ui/issues/` r? ``````````@jieyouxu`````````` As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult. This change was discussed here [#t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Discussion.20for.20ui.20test.20suite.20improvements/near/529566433)
r? @jieyouxu
As it is making cleanup efforts more difficult.
This change was discussed here #t-compiler > Discussion for ui test suite improvements @ 💬