Skip to content

Conversation

@mu001999
Copy link
Contributor

@mu001999 mu001999 commented Sep 24, 2025

Fixes #146968

Emit error CfgPredicateIdentifier if the word is path-segment keyword.

Detailed change description - #146978 (comment).

r? petrochenkov

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 24, 2025

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing

cc @jdonszelmann

@rustbot rustbot added A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 24, 2025
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Could you

  • add similar test cases for some non path-segment keyword, like struct
  • add test cases for --cfg on command line and make sure that they behave identically to cfg! and #[cfg].

After that we should be able to run crater on this.
@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 26, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 26, 2025

Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use @rustbot ready.

@mu001999 mu001999 force-pushed the fix/path-kw-as-cfg-pred branch from 505d13f to b2be57d Compare September 27, 2025 03:24
@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@mu001999
Copy link
Contributor Author

add test cases for --cfg on command line and make sure that they behave identically to cfg! and #[cfg]

--cfg will emit same error but will be suppressed because parse_cfg is called with ParseSess::with_fatal_emitter

@mu001999
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 27, 2025
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

add test cases for --cfg on command line and make sure that they behave identically to cfg! and #[cfg]

--cfg will emit same error but will be suppressed because parse_cfg is called with ParseSess::with_fatal_emitter

with_fatal_emitter doesn't suppress errors, it makes them fatal.
--cfg parsing has its own error reporting logic in fn parse_cfg in compiler\rustc_interface\src\interface.rs, and the new errors are not emitted there.
@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 30, 2025
@mu001999
Copy link
Contributor Author

with_fatal_emitter doesn't suppress errors, it makes them fatal.

@petrochenkov I found with_fatal_emitter create dcx with FatalOnlyEmitter, see

pub fn with_fatal_emitter(locale_resources: Vec<&'static str>, fatal_note: String) -> Self {
let translator = Translator::with_fallback_bundle(locale_resources, false);
let sm = Arc::new(SourceMap::new(FilePathMapping::empty()));
let fatal_emitter =
Box::new(HumanEmitter::new(stderr_destination(ColorConfig::Auto), translator));
let dcx = DiagCtxt::new(Box::new(FatalOnlyEmitter {
fatal_emitter,
fatal_note: Some(fatal_note),
}))
.disable_warnings();
ParseSess::with_dcx(dcx, sm)
}

and the comment of FatalOnlyEmitter and the impl of FatalOnlyEmitter::emit_diagnostic show only errors with diag.level == Level::Fatal can be emitted, see

/// An emitter that does nothing when emitting a non-fatal diagnostic.
/// Fatal diagnostics are forwarded to `fatal_emitter` to avoid silent
/// failures of rustc, as witnessed e.g. in issue #89358.
pub struct FatalOnlyEmitter {
pub fatal_emitter: Box<dyn Emitter + DynSend>,
pub fatal_note: Option<String>,
}
impl Emitter for FatalOnlyEmitter {
fn source_map(&self) -> Option<&SourceMap> {
None
}
fn emit_diagnostic(&mut self, mut diag: DiagInner, registry: &Registry) {
if diag.level == Level::Fatal {
if let Some(fatal_note) = &self.fatal_note {
diag.sub(Level::Note, fatal_note.clone(), MultiSpan::new());
}
self.fatal_emitter.emit_diagnostic(diag, registry);
}
}
fn translator(&self) -> &Translator {
self.fatal_emitter.translator()
}
}

@mu001999
Copy link
Contributor Author

mu001999 commented Sep 30, 2025

I have debug the logic in fn parse_cfg, and the err.emit is called in fact, but it is suppressed by the FatalOnlyEmitter.

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

petrochenkov commented Sep 30, 2025

Ah, ok, "fatal emitter" means "fatal-only emitter".

In any case, the behavior is not correct.
I guess the assumption when using the fatal emitter was that we always reach the "expected key or key="value"" error at the bottom anyway, but that's not actually the case.
If we get to return (ident.name, meta_item.value_str()), then all the non-fatal errors are lost, which is incorrect.

@mu001999 mu001999 marked this pull request as draft October 9, 2025 06:02
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@mu001999 mu001999 force-pushed the fix/path-kw-as-cfg-pred branch from 956aa91 to 97cd2c7 Compare October 9, 2025 11:16
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@mu001999 mu001999 force-pushed the fix/path-kw-as-cfg-pred branch from 97cd2c7 to a7d6090 Compare October 9, 2025 11:54
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@mu001999 mu001999 force-pushed the fix/path-kw-as-cfg-pred branch from a7d6090 to c8bc460 Compare October 9, 2025 15:31
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@mu001999 mu001999 force-pushed the fix/path-kw-as-cfg-pred branch from cc53ca4 to 9c2ed4c Compare October 9, 2025 18:10
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 13, 2025
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Nov 13, 2025

Filed #148910

Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2025
…g-pred, r=petrochenkov

Emit error when using path-segment keyword as cfg pred

Fixes rust-lang#146968

Emit error `CfgPredicateIdentifier` if the word is path-segment keyword.

Detailed change description - rust-lang#146978 (comment).

r? petrochenkov
Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2025
…g-pred, r=petrochenkov

Emit error when using path-segment keyword as cfg pred

Fixes rust-lang#146968

Emit error `CfgPredicateIdentifier` if the word is path-segment keyword.

Detailed change description - rust-lang#146978 (comment).

r? petrochenkov
Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2025
…g-pred, r=petrochenkov

Emit error when using path-segment keyword as cfg pred

Fixes rust-lang#146968

Emit error `CfgPredicateIdentifier` if the word is path-segment keyword.

Detailed change description - rust-lang#146978 (comment).

r? petrochenkov
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2025
Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #146978 (Emit error when using path-segment keyword as cfg pred)
 - #148543 (Correctly link to associated trait items in reexports)
 - #148808 (Some resolve cleanups)
 - #148812 (coverage: Associate hole spans with expansion tree nodes )
 - #148826 (CStr docs: Fix CStr vs &CStr confusion)
 - #148850 (Implement `Read::read_array`)
 - #148867 (Refactor `Box::take`)
 - #148870 (Remove unused LLVMModuleRef argument)
 - #148878 (error when ABI does not support guaranteed tail calls)
 - #148901 (Disable rustdoc-test-builder test partially for SGX target.)
 - #148902 (add missing s390x target feature to std detect test)
 - #148904 (waffle: stop watching codegen ssa)
 - #148906 (Expose fmt::Arguments::from_str as unstable.)
 - #148907 (add assembly test for infinite recursion with `become`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2025
…etrochenkov

Emit error when using path-segment keyword as cfg pred

Fixes #146968

Emit error `CfgPredicateIdentifier` if the word is path-segment keyword.

Detailed change description - #146978 (comment).

r? petrochenkov
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 14, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 5d70446 with merge 3d503f1...

@Zalathar
Copy link
Member

Possibly failed in rollup: #148927 (comment)

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 14, 2025
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member

@bors try jobs=x86_64-gnu-aux

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2025
…try>

Emit error when using path-segment keyword as cfg pred

try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
@Zalathar
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Nov 14, 2025
@mu001999
Copy link
Contributor Author

mu001999 commented Nov 14, 2025

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-aux failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Nov 14, 2025

💔 Test for 097ec3c failed: CI. Failed jobs:

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/cargo that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2025
Due to rust-lang/rust#146978, which has been
approved, this test would fail because `--cfg false` is denied now.
@mu001999
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will request retry after cargo updated

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 16, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #148957) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. F-explicit_tail_calls `#![feature(explicit_tail_calls)]` finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-lang Relevant to the language team to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cfg!($crate), cfg!(crate), cfg!(self), cfg!(Self), and cfg!(super) should not be accepted