Skip to content

Conversation

@GrigorenkoPV
Copy link
Contributor

@GrigorenkoPV GrigorenkoPV commented Nov 6, 2025

Tracking issue: #135894
FCP completed: #135894 (comment)

1.96.0 was chosen because I don't think the remaining month until 1.93.0 becomes beta is enough for the FCP to finish and this to get merged, so 1.94.0 + a couple of versions of leeway: #135894 (comment)

Closes #135894

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. labels Nov 6, 2025
@hanna-kruppe
Copy link
Contributor

I would suggest splitting out the lint change into a separate PR. It would be useful even before stabilization, I don't think it requires its own FCP, and it'll make the API stabilization itself a bit easier to review. That's especially important since the simultaneous deprecation makes it a big and tricky diff by stabilization standards!

@GrigorenkoPV
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good idea!

Done: #148601

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2025
…ng, r=Kivooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang#135894
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2025
…ng, r=Kivooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang#135894
Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2025
…ng, r=Kivooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang#135894
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2025
Rollup merge of #148601 - GrigorenkoPV:invalid_atomic_ordering, r=Kivooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from #148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: #135894
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2025
…ooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang/rust#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang/rust#135894
makai410 pushed a commit to makai410/rustc_public that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2025
…ooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang/rust#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang/rust#135894
makai410 pushed a commit to makai410/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2025
…ng, r=Kivooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang#135894
makai410 pushed a commit to makai410/rustc_public that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2025
…ooeo

`invalid_atomic_ordering`: also lint `update` & `try_update`

Split from rust-lang/rust#148590

Tracking issue for `update` and `try_update`: rust-lang/rust#135894
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 23, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #149222) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@GrigorenkoPV GrigorenkoPV marked this pull request as ready for review December 24, 2025 23:22
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 24, 2025
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Dec 24, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 24, 2025

r? @scottmcm

rustbot has assigned @scottmcm.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@GrigorenkoPV
Copy link
Contributor Author

GrigorenkoPV commented Dec 24, 2025

@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-FCP

RIP

and deprecate fetch_update starting 1.96.0
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 24, 2025

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tracking Issue for atomic_try_update

6 participants