Skip to content

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum commented Jan 5, 2022

Backports these PRs:

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

compiler-errors and others added 6 commits January 5, 2022 15:07
…f not set."

This reverts commit b376f56, which is
the main part of rust-lang#90499, because it turns out that this causes a good
amount of breakage in crates relying on the old behavior.

Fixes rust-lang#91372.
Adds the minimial repro test case from rust-lang#85360. The fix for rust-lang#85360 was
supposed to be rust-lang#85868 however the repro was resolved in the 2021-07-05
nightly while rust-lang#85360 didn't land until 2021-09-03. The reason for that
is d34a3a4 **also** resolves that
issue.

To test if rust-lang#85868 actually fixes rust-lang#85360, I reverted
d34a3a4 and found that rust-lang#85868 does
indeed resolve rust-lang#85360.

With that question resolved, add a test case to our incremental test
suite for the original Ok(EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions) ICE.

Thanks to @lqd for helping track this down!
As suggested via reviewer feedback.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Some changes occurred in HTML/CSS/JS.

cc @GuillaumeGomez,@Folyd

@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 5, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!
  • These commits modify compiler targets. (See the Target Tier Policy.)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 5, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@Aaron1011 @jackh726 @wesleywiser (not sure if others should also be cc'd) I'm seeing this diff on this PR for the test added by #91065, which seems potentially like we're missing a backport of some other PR? This does include #90423, but perhaps we need a separate PR to add to that...

(Also going to ping on Zulip as we don't have much time before the release).

16	LL | fn test<T: Sized>(_: T) {}
17	   |            ----- predicate
18	
-	error: evaluate(Binder(TraitPredicate(<MaskedStorage<GenericComp2<Pos>> as std::marker::Sized>, polarity:Positive), [])) = Ok(EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions)
+	error: evaluate(Binder(TraitPredicate(<MaskedStorage<GenericComp2<Pos>> as std::marker::Sized>, polarity:Positive), [])) = Ok(EvaluatedToOk)
20	  --> $DIR/issue-85360-eval-obligation-ice.rs:13:5
21	   |
22	LL |     test::<MaskedStorage<GenericComp2<Pos>>>(make());

25	LL | fn test<T: Sized>(_: T) {}
26	   |         - predicate
27	
-	error: evaluate(Binder(TraitPredicate(<MaskedStorage<GenericComp2<Pos>> as std::marker::Sized>, polarity:Positive), [])) = Ok(EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions)
+	error: evaluate(Binder(TraitPredicate(<MaskedStorage<GenericComp2<Pos>> as std::marker::Sized>, polarity:Positive), [])) = Ok(EvaluatedToOk)
29	  --> $DIR/issue-85360-eval-obligation-ice.rs:13:5

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Stand-in for a backport of "Sync portable-simd to remove autosplats rust-lang#91484".
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 6, 2022

📌 Commit 439efc1 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 6, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2022

📌 Commit 10f9a63 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors p=1 (release next week)

@camelid camelid added the T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jan 7, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 10f9a63 with merge 43f02cd4a7180e8dc2f2739e3a6d979da7e8496e...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=1

Cherry-picked 615604f to fix the tests as well.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2022

📌 Commit e458615 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors p=10 (setting up another rollup to merge after this)

@Aaron1011
Copy link
Contributor

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2022

⌛ Testing commit e458615 with merge 4aa9d23...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 4aa9d23 to beta...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 8, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 4aa9d23 into rust-lang:beta Jan 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Jan 8, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the beta-next branch January 12, 2022 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.