Skip to content

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

RalfJung and others added 17 commits March 10, 2022 18:59
The current structure makes it hard to tell that there are just four
distinct code paths, depending on how many items there are in `bb_items`
and `next_items`. This commit introduces a `match` that clarifies
things.
They should only appear in transcribers.
Also rename `inner_parse_loop` as `parse_tt_inner`, because it's no
longer just a loop.
For consistency, and to make the code slightly nicer.
…, r=notriddle

Collapse blanket and auto-trait impls by default

Blocked on rust-lang#94740 (the two first commits come from it).

This behaviour was changed in rust-lang#88490 and apparently wasn't caught since then.

You can test it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/collapsed-by-default/test_docs/struct.Foo.html#blanket-implementations).

r? `@notriddle`
…trochenkov

`parse_tt` refactorings

Some readability improvements.

r? `@petrochenkov`
CTFE/Miri: detect out-of-bounds pointers in offset_from

Also I became uneasy with aggressively doing `try_to_int` here -- this will always succeed on Miri, leading to the wrong codepath being taken. We should rather try to convert them both to pointers, and use the integer path as a fallback, so that's what I implemented now.

Hiding whitespaces helps with the diff.

Fixes rust-lang/miri#1950

r? `@oli-obk`
…an-DPC

Make float parsing docs more comprehensive

I was working on some code with some specialized restrictions on float parsing. I noticed the doc comments for `f32::from_str` and `f64::from_str` were missing several cases of valid inputs that are otherwise difficult to discover without looking at source code.

I'm not sure if the doc comments were initially intended to contain a comprehensive description of valid inputs, but I figured it's useful to include these extra cases for reference.
…for-struct-field-type, r=cjgillot

Suggest using double colon when a struct field type include single colon

rust-lang#92685
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Mar 11, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 11, 2022

📌 Commit 4f50683 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 11, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 11, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 4f50683 with merge fe9f0d6d649f760717a132dccf5aa721862583ce...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 11, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 11, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

(spurious, making a larger rollup)

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC closed this Mar 11, 2022
@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC deleted the rollup-8vpduff branch March 11, 2022 19:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants