Skip to content

Using git § I changed a submodule by accident: be explicit #2462

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2025

Conversation

lolbinarycat
Copy link
Contributor

Rewriting git history is something that is often difficult for new contributors, and we're already explaining the <foo> placeholder syntax, so I think it makes sense to be explicit about what exactly the paths mean.

Rewriting git history is something that is often difficult for new contributors,
and we're already explaining the `<foo>` placeholder syntax,
so I think it makes sense to be explicit about what exactly the paths mean.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 10, 2025

Thanks for the PR. If you have write access, feel free to merge this PR if it does not need reviews. You can request a review using r? rustc-dev-guide or r? <username>.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: this PR is waiting for a reviewer to verify its content label Jun 10, 2025
@jieyouxu jieyouxu merged commit 57b4d5c into rust-lang:master Jun 10, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: this PR is waiting for a reviewer to verify its content
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants