Skip to content

Feat; Create new table for collector configuration #2157

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 17, 2025

Conversation

Jamesbarford
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamesbarford Jamesbarford commented Jun 11, 2025

Creates a table for collector configuration; storing the target, whether the collector is active and able to take work. Has a heartbeat column so we can see if the collector goes offline. benchmark_set is for when we start splitting work between collectors

Copy link
Member

@Kobzol Kobzol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I think that the table looks good like it is, but also I don't think we necessarily need to merge this outright.

So I'd keep this lying here until we have some actual code (probably first in the website) that actually needs to use this table, and then write the corresponding DbPool queries so that we have a user of the table. Maybe we'll figure out that we need some additional columns by then or something.

@Jamesbarford Jamesbarford force-pushed the feat/collector-config-table branch from adc0417 to e8b9121 Compare July 14, 2025 12:24
@Jamesbarford Jamesbarford force-pushed the feat/collector-config-table branch from ad866ba to 2e7ced8 Compare July 17, 2025 09:51
Copy link
Member

@Kobzol Kobzol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@Kobzol Kobzol merged commit 2120e3b into rust-lang:master Jul 17, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants