Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Dec 8, 2025

CI Build Failure Analysis - RESOLVED

Root Cause Identified: GitLab Infrastructure Issue ✅

Issue Summary

The Stage 1 CI build failure is NOT caused by code changes in PR #9. The Docker build fails when trying to clone PETSc from GitLab due to a server-side error:

fatal: unable to access 'https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc.git/': The requested URL returned error: 500

Error Location

  • File: docker/pylith-testenv (line 49)
  • Command: RUN git clone --branch knepley/pylith --single-branch https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc.git ${PETSC_DIR}
  • Error: HTTP 500 (Internal Server Error from GitLab)

Code Verification

All code changes in PR #9 have been verified as correct:

  • ✅ Python test files (TestThermoelasticity.py, TestThermoporoelasticity.py) - syntax valid
  • ✅ Build system configuration (Makefile.am, init.py) - properly wired
  • ✅ Module dependencies - all exist with correct exports
  • ✅ C++ and SWIG files - present and properly configured

Resolution

This is a transient infrastructure issue. The CI will pass when re-run after GitLab servers recover.

Action Required: Re-run the failed CI workflow (no code changes needed)


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.


Note

No code changes; diff is empty.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit e6faa03. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@rwalkerlewis
Copy link
Owner

@copilot included are the CI logs in archive form
logs_51511906639.zip

Copy link
Author

Copilot AI commented Dec 8, 2025

Just as a heads up, I was blocked by some firewall rules while working on your feedback. Expand below for details.

Warning

Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)

I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:

  • https://api.github.com/repos/rwalkerlewis/pylith/commits/66a7a8095ad3f66ae0b4e946780358dd6e4888a3/check-runs
    • Triggering command: /usr/bin/curl curl -s -H Accept: application/vnd.github+json REDACTED (http block)
  • https://api.github.com/repos/rwalkerlewis/pylith/commits/66a7a8095ad3f66ae0b4e946780358dd6e4888a3/status
    • Triggering command: /usr/bin/curl curl -s REDACTED (http block)

If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix Python syntax issues in CI tests Investigate CI Stage 1 Docker build failure Dec 8, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from rwalkerlewis December 8, 2025 07:40
Copy link
Author

Copilot AI commented Dec 8, 2025

@copilot included are the CI logs in archive form
logs_51511906639.zip

Found the issue! The CI failure is not related to the code changes in PR #9.

The Docker build is failing when trying to clone PETSc from GitLab:

fatal: unable to access 'https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc.git/': The requested URL returned error: 500
ERROR: process "/bin/sh -c git clone --branch knepley/pylith --single-branch https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc.git ${PETSC_DIR}" did not complete successfully: exit code: 128

This is a transient GitLab server error (HTTP 500). The CI should pass if re-run once GitLab is back to normal. All code changes in PR #9 are correct - the Python test files, build configuration, and module wiring are all properly set up.

Action: Simply re-run the failed CI workflow once GitLab recovers from the server error.

@rwalkerlewis
Copy link
Owner

@copilot included is the output from the docker build:

2_stage-1 _ tests (debian-stable).txt

@rwalkerlewis rwalkerlewis marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2025 07:42
@rwalkerlewis rwalkerlewis merged commit f866c93 into cursor/check-and-fix-ci-tests-claude-4.5-opus-high-thinking-ef57 Dec 8, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@rwalkerlewis rwalkerlewis deleted the copilot/sub-pr-9 branch December 8, 2025 07:42
Copilot AI requested a review from rwalkerlewis December 8, 2025 07:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants