Skip to content

Conversation

@noel2004
Copy link
Member

The new witnesses being dump and tested with specifying TRACE_PATH in integration_test has been expected to be generated with new format. While read_block_witness method still read them with legacy defination. This PR fix the issue and also keep compatibility with the current test data samples (still in old format)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the crate-integration Updates to the integration crate label Sep 22, 2025
@noel2004 noel2004 requested review from lightsing and lispc September 22, 2025 04:07
@lispc
Copy link
Collaborator

lispc commented Sep 22, 2025

  1. dont use env var. Just try to load in one format, if it fails, try another format.
  2. rename the new test to sth like test_load_witness_file. of course we can still print ommer block hash inside.

@github-actions github-actions bot added crate-chunk-circuit Updates to the guest program chunk-circuit crate-batch-circuit Updates to the guest program batch-circuit crate-bundle-circuit Updates to the guest grogram bundle-circuit crate-prover Updates to the prover crate crate-circuits Any update made to the circuits, i.e. commitments reflect a change labels Sep 22, 2025
@noel2004
Copy link
Member Author

  1. dont use env var. Just try to load in one format, if it fails, try another format.
  2. rename the new test to sth like test_load_witness_file. of course we can still print ommer block hash inside.
  1. fixed
  2. The new test is some temporary code and being added by mistake so I simply prune them

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

crate-batch-circuit Updates to the guest program batch-circuit crate-bundle-circuit Updates to the guest grogram bundle-circuit crate-chunk-circuit Updates to the guest program chunk-circuit crate-circuits Any update made to the circuits, i.e. commitments reflect a change crate-integration Updates to the integration crate crate-prover Updates to the prover crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants