Skip to content

add class equivalence to contract term - #1509

Open
philblackwood wants to merge 4 commits into
developfrom
1354-ContractTerm
Open

philblackwood wants to merge 4 commits into
developfrom
1354-ContractTerm

Conversation

@philblackwood

@philblackwood philblackwood commented Aug 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes #1354

Simplified definition to "A specification that is part of a contract."

Added class equivalence: Specification and (isPartOf some Contract)

Comment thread ontologies/gistCore.ttl Outdated
Comment thread docs/release_notes/1354-ContractTerm Outdated
philblackwood and others added 2 commits September 28, 2026 10:49
Co-authored-by: Rebecca Younes <rebecca.younes@semanticarts.com>
Co-authored-by: Jamie-SA <45212760+Jamie-SA@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add restriction to ContractTerm (was Should ContractTerm be a subclass of Specification?)

3 participants