Skip to content

Performance on GenImage lower than reported #24

Description

@Chuchad

Hi, thank you for sharing this great work!
I was trying to reproduce the results on the GenImage dataset following the training and evaluation instructions in the repository, but I found that the reproduced performance is significantly lower than what was reported in the paper.
Following settings are chosen by myself, while others remain the same with the original paper.

Settings:

Results:

Subset Acc
adm 0.7106
biggan 0.5447
glide 0.9565
midjourney 0.7913
sdv4 0.9993
sdv5 0.9989
vqdm 0.8103
wukong 0.9963
AVG 0.8510

As you can see, the Performance is lower than reported.
I set batchsize as 32 and choose the best ckpt in the 5 epochs, but I'did use 8 * A100 as reported in the paper. Since Learning rate is not changed, I am not sure if I need to scale lr according to my hardware setting. I wonder if you have seen such behavior in your experiment. Thank you.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions