Use a builder to configure the formatter #113
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #113 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.27% 99.25% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 3887 3870 -17
Branches 3887 3870 -17
==========================================
- Hits 3859 3841 -18
- Misses 20 21 +1
Partials 8 8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
You may look at the tests to see the usage, if you like it I can finish converting the tests.
Formatter::config().params(params).inline(true)... .format() |
|
Do any of the examples in the readme need to be updated as well? |
|
All of them, thank you for reminding me :) We should discuss a little bit few details btw |
| /// | ||
| /// Default: None | ||
| pub ignore_case_convert: Option<Vec<&'a str>>, | ||
| ignore_case_convert: Option<Vec<&'a str>>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This could be later changed to accept AsRef<[&str]> so one can pass to the builder also &[&str],[&str; N] and so on.
| Named(Vec<(String, String)>), | ||
| Indexed(Vec<String>), | ||
| pub enum QueryParams<'a> { | ||
| Named(Cow<'a, [(String, String)]>), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This could be made simpler by taking only by reference, but I wanted your opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I think having either either all owned or all references would make usage simpler, and all references is likely the better option due to performance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As I did now, it is almost transparent to the user.
2 participants
No description provided.