Skip to content

docs(server-delivery): model static-link as a blind spot, not a third layer#163

Merged
haksungjang merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/server-two-layer-model
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

docs(server-delivery): model static-link as a blind spot, not a third layer#163
haksungjang merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/server-two-layer-model

Conversation

@haksungjang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

서버를 OS·애플리케이션·정적 링크 '세 층'으로 동급 나열했으나 분류 축이 어긋났습니다(OS·앱은 소속 기준, 정적 링크는 탐지 방법 기준). 정적 링크 라이브러리는 독립 층이 아니라 패키지 매니저·OS 패키지 DB가 모두 놓치는 사각지대입니다.

서버를 두 층(OS·애플리케이션)으로 보고, 정적 링크는 '두 층의 사각지대'로 재배치했습니다(가시성은 유지 — 가장 흔한 반려 원인). 섹션 제목을 그에 맞게 바꾸고 바이너리 모드·수기·BDBA 안내는 유지했습니다. 한·영 동일 적용.

… layer

The page listed OS, application, and static-link as three equal layers,
but the classification axis was inconsistent: OS and application are
"what it belongs to," while static-link is "how it is detected." A
statically linked library is part of the application (or an OS package)
build, not an independent layer — it is the blind spot that the package
manager and the OS package database both miss.

Treat the server as two layers (OS, application) and present static-link
libraries as a blind spot of both, kept visible (it is the most common
rejection cause) but no longer a peer layer. Rename the section
accordingly and keep its binary-mode + manual + BDBA guidance.
@haksungjang haksungjang merged commit 05532eb into main Jun 17, 2026
24 checks passed
@haksungjang haksungjang deleted the docs/server-two-layer-model branch June 17, 2026 04:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant