-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/keystone beholder integration #14510
Conversation
1f8a73d
to
25800ef
Compare
I see you updated files related to
|
…n workflow monitoring
* manually adding edits from closed PR #14744 * cleanup * lint
AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
* added TODO placeholders * sketch of adding beholder custom messages * other options * adding more idiomatic option * unit testing labeling * adding a sample beholder metric emission * refactoring to use labeled context utilities * bumping common to use custom proto for Keystone Custom Message * trying out sendLogAsCustomMessageWithLabels * simplifying * bumping chainlink-common * adding labels field to Engine + expanding log as custom message API in workflow monitoring * gomodtidy * Adding customMessageAgent * adding initial engine metrics * minor cleanup * %s --> %w. interface{} --> any * Feature/keystone beholder alerts syncer 2 (#14786) * manually adding edits from closed PR #14744 * cleanup * lint * lint * adding newline back to .tool-versions
c26973f
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Initial integration of Keystone w/ beholder
Dependencies
https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink-common/pull/828/commits