Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: ds configurator Changesets #16713

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ChrisAmora
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisAmora ChrisAmora commented Mar 10, 2025

Description

Add Configurator support for data streams deployment module

References

@ChrisAmora ChrisAmora changed the title feat: configurator feat: ds configurator deployment Mar 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2025

AER Report: CI Core ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

AER Report: Operator UI CI ran successfully ✅

aer_workflow , commit

@ChrisAmora ChrisAmora requested a review from ro-tex March 10, 2025 23:55
@ChrisAmora ChrisAmora marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2025 13:40
@ChrisAmora ChrisAmora requested review from a team as code owners March 11, 2025 13:40
@ChrisAmora ChrisAmora changed the title feat: ds configurator deployment feat: ds configurator Changesets Mar 11, 2025
@akuzni2
Copy link
Contributor

akuzni2 commented Mar 11, 2025

Since we currently have 6 contract types - does it make sense to organize them into their own package? I think this organization would make sense when we start having future contract versions as well that their implementation details can be tucked away in a package. I started doing this but can keep everything flat if we don't want to do this

commonChangesets.Configure(
DeployConfiguratorChangeset,
DeployConfiguratorConfig{
ChainsToDeploy: []uint64{chainSelector},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

set MCMS config? Or come back and do this later?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants