Add evaluation harness for reasoning scenarios#6
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
This PR adds the v0.7 evaluation harness and benchmark suite without expanding the reasoning architecture itself.
cot,reflection,multi_agent_debate, andrisk_ruleWhy it changed
The next stage of the project needs evidence, not more unchecked architectural growth. This PR creates a repeatable offline benchmark harness so InnerBrain-Factor can be compared against simpler baselines on risk recognition, long-term goal retention, attention stability, creativity-safety balance, evidence-gap detection, human-judgment correctness, and over-gating.
Validation
/Users/qianjinus/Documents/类脑/innerbrain-factor/.venv/bin/pytest->28 passed in 0.10sinnerbrain eval --scenario-dir evals/scenarios --output-path evals/results/latest.json --failure-report-path evals/results/latest_failures.mdObserved comparison on the current benchmark set:
innerbrain_factorcomposite:1.00multi_agent_debatecomposite:0.66reflectioncomposite:0.59risk_rulecomposite:0.58cotcomposite:0.37Safety boundary