📝 docs: accept SEP-0000 as formal process document - #42
Conversation
- Change status from Draft to Accepted - Add discussion link (discussions/41) - Clarify sole maintainer decision authority during bootstrap - Add SEP-0000 self-amendment rules - Update seps-index.json to reflect Accepted status
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 32048f7e39
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| "authors": [ | ||
| "Spore maintainers" | ||
| "Zhan Rongrui" | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The index now rewrites authors for unrelated documents (e.g., SEP-0001 through SEP-0008 and drafts/script-mode.md) to Zhan Rongrui, even though their front matter still lists Spore maintainers (seps/SEP-0001-core-syntax.md:6-8, drafts/script-mode.md:6-8). This breaks the documented contract that seps-index.json mirrors SEP front matter and will cause any tooling/UI that reads the index to show incorrect attribution for most proposals.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
zrr1999
changed the title
zrr1999
changed the title
- Promote SEP-0000 from Draft to Accepted - Add discussion link (discussions/41) and PR link - Clarify sole maintainer authority + self-amendment rules - Normalize author fields across SEP-0001 through SEP-0008 - Regenerate seps-index.json via --fix
zrr1999
changed the title
1 participant
Summary
Promote SEP-0000 (Spore Enhancement Proposal Process) from Draft to Accepted.
Changes
SEP-0000-process.md
seps-index.json