Skip to content

Conversation

@IgorMilavec
Copy link
Collaborator

@IgorMilavec IgorMilavec commented May 4, 2021

Core async support requested by #153.

Added async support to BaseClient: (update 2021-05-11)

  • ConnectAsync

Added async support to SftpClient:

  • ListDirectoryAsync
  • GetStatusAsync
  • OpenAsync
  • DeleteFileAsync
  • RenameFileAsync
  • DownloadFileAsync
  • UploadFileAsync

Added async support to SftpFileStream:

  • OpenAsync
  • ReadAsync
  • WriteAsync
  • FlushAsync

Added net46 target to use async in .NET Framework.

This PR is intended to resolve #153.
This PR is intended to supersede #300 and #661.

{
throw;
}
catch (Exception)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the generic class Exception be caught here? Or something more specific?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Possibly, but I only reused the logic of sync versions of the functions at this time. When/if this is released, practice will show if any changes need to be made.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When FileMode is Create, I think we should just use Flags.CreateNewOrOpen | Flags.Truncate.
Let me run some checks later.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can confirm that it's ok to just add Flags.CreateNewOrOpen | Flags.Truncate when mode is FileMode.Create.

if (count < 0)
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("count");
if ((buffer.Length - offset) < count)
throw new ArgumentException("Invalid array range.");

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Specify second parameter to ArgumentException, nameof(buffer).

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure about that, any of the three could be wrong, depending on the caller's intention. Anyhow, this is the same as the sync version, so we either need to change both or none...

/// <exception cref="SftpPermissionDeniedException">Permission to list the contents of the directory was denied by the remote host. <para>-or-</para> A SSH command was denied by the server.</exception>
/// <exception cref="SshException">A SSH error where <see cref="Exception.Message" /> is the message from the remote host.</exception>
/// <exception cref="ObjectDisposedException">The method was called after the client was disposed.</exception>
public async Task<IEnumerable<SftpFile>> ListDirectoryAsync(string path, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
Copy link

@vanillajonathan vanillajonathan May 11, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider returning ICollection or IReadOnlyCollection rather than IEnumerable as per the Microsoft Guidelines for Collections.

DO use Collection or a subclass of Collection for properties or return values representing read/write collections.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be IAsyncEnumerable<SftpFile>. It's only supported on .NET 4.6.1 or higher.
For .NET 4.6.1 and .NET Standard 2.0, you need to add a reference to Microsoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then we need to remove FEATURE_TAP from netstandard1.3. Also, we take two "external" dependencies (AsyncInterfaces and Task.Extensions).
What if we leave this one as it is and add IAsyncEnumerable<SftpFile> EnumerateDirectoryAsync(...) for netstandard2.1+ ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I won't let this block this merge request, but I still strongly consider changing this method to return IAsyncEnumerable<SftpFile>. I also don't like bringing in additional dependencies, but the alternative is not better.

@schaveyt
Copy link
Contributor

Any chance this could also target .net5 or .net6 as well

@IgorMilavec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The library already targets netstandard2.0, so you can reference it from net5 or net6 projects.
It would only be beneficial for the library to target net5+ if it would use any net5+ features, like Spans etc. But this is out of scope of this issue and this PR. IMO we should remove legacy targets (please see #665) before adding any modern code.

@schaveyt
Copy link
Contributor

I did not connect those dots. Thank you for clarifying 👍

@paulmaybee
Copy link

This addition looks like it has a great deal of value. Is there a timetable or estimate for when the PR will be completed?

@IgorMilavec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This PR if functionally complete IMO. It should also be stable, I have been running it in production since July. Now we need @drieseng to review and merge it.

@drieseng
Copy link
Member

@IgorMilavec Thanks, I'll try to find time in the coming days.

@IgorMilavec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Figured this is the last chance to modify UploadFileAsync signature before this becomes a breaking change... :)

@IgorMilavec IgorMilavec requested a review from drieseng November 21, 2021 18:24
@IgorMilavec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I believe I have addressed all the trivial items. @drieseng can you please re-review the code and my comments?

<LangVersion>5</LangVersion>
<SignAssembly>true</SignAssembly>
<TargetFrameworks>net35;net40;netstandard1.3;netstandard2.0</TargetFrameworks>
<TargetFrameworks>net35;net40;net46;netstandard1.3;netstandard2.0</TargetFrameworks>
Copy link
Member

@drieseng drieseng Nov 28, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@IgorMilavec, is it ok for you to target .NET Framework 4.7.2 (or 4.8) instead?

{
throw;
}
catch (Exception)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can confirm that it's ok to just add Flags.CreateNewOrOpen | Flags.Truncate when mode is FileMode.Create.

@IgorMilavec IgorMilavec requested a review from drieseng December 6, 2021 22:19
@drieseng
Copy link
Member

drieseng commented Dec 7, 2021

@IgorMilavec Thanks for hanging on. I'll do my best to finish the review some time this week.

@drieseng drieseng merged commit 7bdfc9e into sshnet:develop Dec 14, 2021
@drieseng
Copy link
Member

We're still lacking (unit & integration) test coverage, but I'm ok with adding these as a follow PR.
I'd also like to discuss further how to proceed with ISftpClient.ListDirectoryAsync(...). In its current state, this is not a true async method.

That said: Thx !!!!!!!!

@Dimencia
Copy link

Working on a large project at work and just ran into this being a problem, that's awesome that hours before I (realized I) needed it, there was already a PR merged

I'll be pulling this down and trying it tomorrow, nice work, and thanks

@IgorMilavec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @drieseng !
I'll start working on unit tests. After these are complete I can tackle the message pump and make it Task based as we already discussed.
Regarding ISftpClient.ListDirectoryAsync(...): the current version is already async, but it is not "streaming". For directories with small amount of files (up to the amount that SftpReadDirRequest returns) there is no difference. For a directory with large amount of files, the current implementation only completes (asynchronously) when all the file infos are read. The IAsyncEnumerable implementation would allow the caller to process file names in chunks (of the amount returned by one SftpReadDirRequest) even before all the file infos are read back. Let me implement another function with IAsyncEnumerable and then we can discuss further, OK?

@drieseng
Copy link
Member

@IgorMilavec Thanks for taking this up. I'm ok with having a second method for ISftpClient.ListDirectoryAsync(...) as POC.

@noahmehl
Copy link

When we review this PR, it looks like these methods are not actually implemented:

  • DownloadFileAsync
  • UploadFileAsync

Are we just mis-understanding the PR itself?

@IgorMilavec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

These functions were initially implemented as part of this PR, but during the code review we decided that these functions are not really necessary, as they can be easily implemented in the consuming code with a couple of lines of code.

If you have no special requirements, you can use this extension class to get these two functions:

namespace Renci.SshNet
{
    public static class SftpClientExtensions
    {
        public static async Task DownloadFileAsync(this SftpClient sftpClient, string path, Stream output, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        {
            using (Stream remoteStream = await sftpClient.OpenAsync(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false))
            {
                await remoteStream.CopyToAsync(output, 81920, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
        }

        public static async Task UploadFileAsync(this SftpClient sftpClient, Stream input, string path, FileMode createMode, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        {
            using (Stream remoteStream = await sftpClient.OpenAsync(path, createMode, FileAccess.Write, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false))
            {
                await input.CopyToAsync(remoteStream, 81920, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
        }
    }
}

@noahmehl
Copy link

noahmehl commented Jan 2, 2022

@IgorMilavec Thank you so much for your quick and thoughtful reply. We will take a look at this asap.

@jjxtra
Copy link

jjxtra commented Jul 19, 2022

Are these methods in official nuget? Not seeing any async methods on the sftpclient...

@vanillajonathan
Copy link

vanillajonathan commented Jul 20, 2022

I think the DownloadFileAsync and UploadFileAsync methods ought to be included, because I think this should be a async-first library where async should be the default behavior users use, and it should be easy to do so.

To be honest, I would like to see the non-async methods get removed as well as the legacy Begin* and End* async functions.

@WojciechNagorski
Copy link
Collaborator

Version 2023.0.0 has been published https://www.nuget.org/packages/SSH.NET/2023.0.0

@snargledorf
Copy link
Contributor

Something that just bit me is that the OpenAsync method expects an absolute path while the Begin/End async methods for Upload/Download operate relative to the working directory.

Not sure what the best way to handle this would be, but it might be less likely to make a mistake if there were replacement methods on the SftpClient (DownloadAsync/UploadAsync) that behaved in the same way as the Begin/End methods (Relative to working directory), while OpenAsync remains absolute as to not break existing code.

@MarkEnverus
Copy link

MarkEnverus commented Nov 2, 2023

namespace Renci.SshNet
{
    public static class SftpClientExtensions
    {
        public static async Task DownloadFileAsync(this SftpClient sftpClient, string path, Stream output, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        {
            using (Stream remoteStream = await sftpClient.OpenAsync(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false))
            {
                await remoteStream.CopyToAsync(output, 81920, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
        }

        public static async Task UploadFileAsync(this SftpClient sftpClient, Stream input, string path, FileMode createMode, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        {
            using (Stream remoteStream = await sftpClient.OpenAsync(path, createMode, FileAccess.Write, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false))
            {
                await input.CopyToAsync(remoteStream, 81920, cancellationToken).ConfigureAwait(false);
            }
        }
    }
}

@IgorMilavec the issue here is that we cannot moq this code since we can't create a SftpFileStream (as it's not an interface and it's private). Whereas we can moq UploadFile (void return) unless OpenAsync returned a generic Stream instead of a wrapped Stream

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for a Task based async API