Skip to content

Conversation

@ChrisJBurns
Copy link
Collaborator

@ChrisJBurns ChrisJBurns commented Nov 14, 2025

We currently have mcpgroup e2e tests that only verify that certain conditions are set when CRDs are applied. These are perfect for integration tests as it doesn't need the full cluster setup and just a thin API server. This allows us to remove a e2e tests making builds and PR CI tests longer whilst also allowing us to catch failures earlier in the process. This PR makes the e2e tests 30-40 seconds faster.

As part of the PR we also make the status messages slightly nicer to read.

We currently have mcpgroup e2e tests that only verify that certain
conditions are set when CRDs are applied. These are perfect for
integration tests as it doesn't need the full cluster setup.

Signed-off-by: ChrisJBurns <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ChrisJBurns <[email protected]>
@ChrisJBurns ChrisJBurns changed the title Moves heavyweight mcpgroup e2e tests to integration tests moves heavyweight mcpgroup e2e tests to integration tests Nov 14, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.55%. Comparing base (acf8502) to head (f66c2f0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2594   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.55%   55.55%           
=======================================
  Files         309      309           
  Lines       29129    29129           
=======================================
  Hits        16184    16184           
  Misses      11518    11518           
  Partials     1427     1427           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ChrisJBurns ChrisJBurns enabled auto-merge (squash) November 14, 2025 22:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants