Skip to content

Conversation

@njordhov
Copy link

Resolves #77

@MarvinJanssen
Copy link
Contributor

@Hero-Gamer seems like a nice little addition. Can we merge?

@Hero-Gamer
Copy link
Contributor

I am working with the SIP Editors committee on detailing that 1st step process more extensively of any proposal from the community.
I do wanna point one thing out, the first step may / may not apply to the bigger SIPs like Stacks 2.1 upgrade or sBTC two way peg. sBTC SIP-021 went to Pull Request first, so it would not follow the "first step in the SIP process" so to speak.

Leaves the question of: Should ALL SIPs include the bigger SIP follow the same 1st step, or is it better to have 2 categories of 1st step? Would love to hear your thoughts. Happy to jump on calls with anyone on this or talk about it on SIP call.

@njordhov
Copy link
Author

njordhov commented Feb 3, 2023

Should ALL SIPs include the bigger SIP follow the same 1st step

It benefits transparency and consistency to have all new SIPs on the issue tracker rather than buried as pull requests.

@BhinbahadurUK
Copy link

BhinbahadurUK commented Feb 4, 2023 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

First step towards submitting a SIP

4 participants