Skip to content

use the original nim-lang/Nim repo instead of a fork #102

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2025
Merged

Conversation

narimiran
Copy link
Contributor

The status-im/Nim fork is not need anymore, since everything needed is getting fixed and backported in a timely manner in the original repo.

This removes one layer of indirection and we won't have to do pointless pulls/syncs in our fork before upgrading to a newer Nim version.

The status-im/Nim fork is not need anymore, since everything
needed is getting fixed and backported in a timely manner in
the original repo.

This removes one layer of indirection and we won't have to do
pointless pulls/syncs in our fork before upgrading to a newer
Nim version.
@narimiran
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tersec does this need something more than your approval before merging?

@tersec tersec merged commit 0be0663 into master May 6, 2025
20 checks passed
@tersec tersec deleted the remove-fork branch May 6, 2025 08:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants