Skip to content

feat!: migrate utils/some-in-by to object/some-in-by #7376

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member

Resolves #7372.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • migrates utils/some-in-by to object/some-in-by

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

This commit removes `@stdlib/utils/some-in-by` in favor of
`@stdlib/object/some-in-by`.

BREAKING CHANGE: remove `utils/some-in-by`

To migrate, users should update their require/import paths to use
`@stdlib/object/some-in-by` which provides the same API and implementation.

Ref: stdlib-js#7372
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Jun 16, 2025
@Neerajpathak07 Neerajpathak07 added the release: Major Breaking change requiring a new major release. label Jun 16, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
namespace/alias2pkg $\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/alias2standalone $\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace $\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}4/4$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2alias $\color{green}100/100$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}10/10$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}100/100$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2related $\color{green}100/100$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}10/10$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}100/100$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2standalone $\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/standalone2pkg $\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}7/7$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}95/95$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
object/some-in-by $\color{red}132/133$
$\color{green}+99.25\%$
$\color{red}13/14$
$\color{green}+92.86\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{red}132/133$
$\color{green}+99.25\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@Neerajpathak07 Neerajpathak07 requested a review from kgryte June 16, 2025 15:47
@Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member Author

I believe there is an existing bug in some-in-by package similar coverage was also obtained in this PR:- #5745

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. release: Major Breaking change requiring a new major release.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC]: migrate utils/some-in-by to object/some-in-by
2 participants