Skip to content

feat: add support for accessor arrays and refactor stats/base/cuminabs #7575

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

deepak427
Copy link
Contributor

@deepak427 deepak427 commented Jul 6, 2025


type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

  • task: lint_filenames status: passed
  • task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
  • task: lint_markdown status: passed
  • task: lint_package_json status: na
  • task: lint_repl_help status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_examples status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed
  • task: lint_python status: na
  • task: lint_r status: na
  • task: lint_c_src status: na
  • task: lint_c_examples status: na
  • task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
  • task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
  • task: lint_shell status: na
  • task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
  • task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed
  • task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Resolves RFC #5645

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • This pull request addresses RFC #5645 by refactoring the @stdlib/stats/base/cuminabs package and adding support for the accessor protocol.
  • Refactor the existing implementation for consistency with other stats/base packages.
  • Add support for accessor arrays via a new implementation.
  • Update and expand the test suite to include accessor-specific tests.
  • Update examples and benchmarks to align with current stdlib conventions.
  • Ensure that the main package delegates to the ndarray implementation.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jul 6, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! Thank you for your contribution to stdlib.

We noticed that the contributing guidelines acknowledgment is missing from your pull request. Here's what you need to do:

  1. Please read our contributing guidelines.

  2. Update your pull request description to include this checked box:

    - [x] Read, understood, and followed the [contributing guidelines](https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md)

This acknowledgment confirms that you've read the guidelines, which include:

  • The developer's certificate of origin
  • Your agreement to license your contributions under the project's terms

We can't review or accept contributions without this acknowledgment.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. We look forward to reviewing your contribution!

@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
stats/base/cuminabs $\color{green}333/333$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}29/29$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}333/333$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. label Jul 6, 2025
@kgryte kgryte requested a review from gururaj1512 July 6, 2025 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Statistics Issue or pull request related to statistical functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[RFC]: refactor and add protocol support to stats/base/cuminabs
2 participants