Add the ability to create action types/actions in only Rust; correctly write actions in Android

[Innominus]

Code formatter has changed the kt code structure for the edited file. If it's not following guidelines/code format standards I'm happy to remove the extra whitespace changes.

Essentially it seems when writing the actions for an action group, it wasn't writing them the same way it was reading them. So it would add the actions but without an ID/title/input so they would show up blank.

Before:

After:

This is also what the code might look like when using the new builder syntax for ActionType and Action:

    let action_type = ActionType::builder("action-buttons")
        .actions(vec![
            Action::builder("visible-id", "Visible").foreground(true).build(),
            Action::builder("notification-action-id", "Notification Action Titles")
                .foreground(true)
                .build(),
        ])
        .build();

[github-actions]

Package Changes Through 3d9f99e

There are 15 changes which include dialog-js with minor, dialog with minor, log with minor, log-js with minor, localhost with patch, barcode-scanner with patch, barcode-scanner-js with patch, http with patch, http-js with patch, nfc with patch, nfc-js with patch, updater with minor, updater-js with minor, upload with minor, upload-js with minor

Planned Package Versions

The following package releases are the planned based on the context of changes in this pull request.

package	current	next
api-example	2.0.38	2.0.39
api-example-js	2.0.34	2.0.35
barcode-scanner	2.4.2	2.4.3
barcode-scanner-js	2.4.2	2.4.3
dialog	2.4.2	2.5.0
dialog-js	2.4.2	2.5.0
http	2.5.4	2.5.5
http-js	2.5.4	2.5.5
localhost	2.3.1	2.3.2
log	2.7.1	2.8.0
log-js	2.7.1	2.8.0
nfc	2.3.3	2.3.4
nfc-js	2.3.3	2.3.4
updater	2.9.0	2.10.0
updater-js	2.9.0	2.10.0
upload	2.3.2	2.4.0
upload-js	2.3.2	2.4.0

Add another change file through the GitHub UI by following this link.

---

Read about change files or the docs at github.com/jbolda/covector

[FabianLars]

ah merging v2 into this branch was dumb of me, i didn't see that your commit wasn't signed (please set that up for the future), i just made that harder so it'd be okay for me to skip it just this once :P

sorry for the long silence btw, i was waiting for the ci errors to be resolved and totally forgot about the PR in the meantime.

[Innominus]

@FabianLars hello! I did even worse and left this for 4 months, I'm so sorry haha. I'll give it a google and fix the signing and get this sorted. Does anything else beyond that need fixing?

Edit: ah the CI stuff is legit not just feature gates breaking things? I'll look into it. Cheers.