-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 721
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added HostEnsureCanCompileStrings and evalable #209
Conversation
These would provide github.com/wicg/trusted-types what it needs to provide source-to-sink security for code strings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add both of these to the next agenda :-)
| [Function bind syntax][bind-syntax] | Kevin Smith | Brian Terlson<br />Matthew Podwysocki | [March 2015][bind-notes] | | ||
| [Function expression decorators][func-expr-decorators] | Igor Minar | Igor Minar | | | ||
| [HostEnsureCanCompileStrings passthrough][heccspt] | Mike Samuel | Mike Samuel | | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one seems like a needs consensus PR more than a proposal to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. So is the process:
- rework it as a PR against tc39/ecma262/spec.html,
- attach the "needs_consensus" label,
- schedule 15 minutes under "9. Web compatibility issues / Needs Consensus PRs" on the agenda
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's certainly up to you if you want to bring it as a proposal - it's possible that some delegates will insist it be one, but it's also possible that delegates will consider it more of a PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In PR form: tc39/ecma262#1498
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ljharb Thanks for explaining. I'll go with PR for now, and have the proposal ready if it's clear that's the way the committee wants to handle it.
Will do. Thanks. |
These would provide github.com/wicg/trusted-types what it needs to provide source-to-sink security for code strings.