Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: allow users with "read" perm to trigger retest #8616

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

waveywaves
Copy link
Member

Changes

chore: allow users with "read" perm to trigger retest.
Currently developers on the repo; apart from the ones with "write" permissions, cannot trigger retests. this change allows users with "read" permissions to trigger retests.

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Has Docs if any changes are user facing, including updates to minimum requirements e.g. Kubernetes version bumps
  • Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • pre-commit Passed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings). See some examples of good release notes.
  • Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

NONE

Currently developers on the repo; apart from the ones with "write" permissions, cannot trigger retests. this change allows users with "read" permissions to trigger retests.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. label Mar 4, 2025
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from abayer and afrittoli March 4, 2025 01:12
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign imjasonh after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @imjasonh in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 4, 2025
@waveywaves
Copy link
Member Author

waveywaves commented Mar 4, 2025

/kind misc

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@waveywaves: The label(s) kind/chore cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

/kind chore

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@waveywaves
Copy link
Member Author

/kind misc

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. label Mar 4, 2025
Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would make any member of the org to be able to run /retest right ?
If that's the case, I "think" it make sense as it's close to the behavior that was on prow jobs.

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

So the list of permissions are read, triage, write, maintain and admin.

I am not sure read means all users who can read or the one that are part of the org.

Triage: Recommended for contributors who need to proactively manage issues, discussions, and pull requests without write access

I think the @tektoncd/core-collaborators are in that case ? It might be a safer bet to start with ?

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

@afrittoli

@afrittoli
Copy link
Member

Yes, this was restricted intentionally because we don't want anyone to be able to run the tests, but it needs to be refined.

Everyone in the org sounds good - we could support things like the "ok-to-test" label too for people outisde the org - that would need some extra logic in https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/blob/main/.github/workflows/chatops_retest.yaml.

In terms of permission, it is possible to specify none, which I believe would mean everyone.
Because of this setting, I believe people in the org will still have none permission on a repo, unless they are part of the collaborators team.

Setting to read here should expand the "retest" ability to the collaborators and then we could have a follow up to extend to org memebers and/or PRs with "ok-to-test".

@waveywaves
Copy link
Member Author

@afrittoli created an issue based on your comment #8621

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants