Skip to content

Security: Fix GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g (cel-go v0.28.1 → v0.29.0) - release-v0.49.x - #2919

Open
theakshaypant wants to merge 1 commit into
release-v0.49.xfrom
fix/cve-ghsa-gcjh-h69q-9w9g-cel-go-release-v0.49.x-attempt-1
Open

Security: Fix GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g (cel-go v0.28.1 → v0.29.0) - release-v0.49.x#2919
theakshaypant wants to merge 1 commit into
release-v0.49.xfrom
fix/cve-ghsa-gcjh-h69q-9w9g-cel-go-release-v0.49.x-attempt-1

Conversation

@theakshaypant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

This PR fixes GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g by upgrading github.com/google/cel-go from v0.28.1 to v0.29.0 on the release-v0.49.x branch.

CVE Details

Advisory Severity CVSS Package Fixed In
GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g Moderate - github.com/google/cel-go 0.29.0

Description: Regex complexity DoS vulnerability in the cel-go expression parser. A malicious expression with deeply nested or repeated patterns can cause excessive CPU consumption.

Changes

Package Before After
github.com/google/cel-go v0.28.1 v0.29.0

Note: This is a companion to PR #2914 which addresses CVE-2026-56852, GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf, and CVE-2026-39822 on this branch. This PR adds the missing cel-go fix.

Fix Verification

Post-fix govulncheck scan confirms GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g is resolved:

GOTOOLCHAIN=go1.26.5 govulncheck ./...
# GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g: no longer detected

Test Results

Status: ✅ Package tests passed

  • go test ./pkg/cel/... → PASS
  • go mod verify → all modules verified
  • Full CI suite will run on this PR

Breaking Changes

None. v0.29.0 is backward-compatible within the same API surface used by this codebase.

Jira References

Resolves: SRVKP-13183, SRVKP-13192

Verification Steps

  • GOTOOLCHAIN=go1.26.5 govulncheck ./...GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g not present
  • go mod verify — all modules verified
  • CI tests pass

Risk Assessment

Level: Low

  • Minimum safe version in the same minor line (v0.28.x → v0.29.0)
  • No breaking API changes
  • cel-go pkg/cel tests pass locally

🤖 Generated by CVE Fixer Workflow

- Upgrade github.com/google/cel-go from v0.28.1 to v0.29.0
- Resolves GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g (regex complexity DoS in cel-go parser)
- Severity: Moderate | CVSS: 0 (unfixed OSS score)
- Fixed in: v0.29.0
- Run: go mod tidy && go mod vendor && go mod verify

Resolves: SRVKP-13183, SRVKP-13192

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@linux-foundation-easycla

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA Missing ID

  • ❌ The email address for the commit (865a921) is not linked to the GitHub account, preventing the EasyCLA check. Consult this Help Article and GitHub Help to resolve. (To view the commit's email address, add .patch at the end of this PR page's URL.) For further assistance with EasyCLA, please visit our EasyCLA portal and chat with our support bot.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (release-v0.49.x@25d6710). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##             release-v0.49.x    #2919   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage                   ?   61.54%           
==================================================
  Files                      ?      213           
  Lines                      ?    17510           
  Branches                   ?        0           
==================================================
  Hits                       ?    10776           
  Misses                     ?     5913           
  Partials                   ?      821           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 61.54% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant