Skip to content

Fix comment for max claimable tokens test in drop721.test.ts #7336

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vtjl10
Copy link

@vtjl10 vtjl10 commented Jun 13, 2025

Description:
This pull request updates a comment in the drop721.test.ts file to clarify the reason for a test failure when attempting to claim more tokens than the allowed maximum. The new comment more clearly explains that the failure occurs because the max claimable is 3 and 2 tokens have already been claimed in previous tests. No functional code changes were made; this is a documentation/comment improvement for better test clarity.


PR-Codex overview

This PR focuses on correcting a comment in the test file drop721.test.ts to fix a typo regarding the claimable tokens, ensuring clarity in the test's intent.

Detailed summary

  • Corrected the typo in the comment from "faile bcause" to "fail because" in the drop721.test.ts file.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Corrected a typo in a test case comment for improved clarity.

Signed-off-by: fuder.eth <[email protected]>
@vtjl10 vtjl10 requested review from a team as code owners June 13, 2025 17:22
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 13, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 8a8977f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Walkthrough

A comment typo was corrected in a test file related to ERC721 drop functionality. No changes were made to the logic or behavior of the code.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/thirdweb/src/extensions/erc721/drop721.test.ts Fixed a typo in a test case comment

Suggested labels

packages, SDK

Suggested reviewers

  • gregfromstl
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Jun 13, 2025

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • merge-queue - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 13, 2025

@vtjl10 is attempting to deploy a commit to the thirdweb Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@github-actions github-actions bot added packages SDK Involves changes to the thirdweb SDK labels Jun 13, 2025
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ describe.runIf(process.env.TW_SECRET_KEY)(
).resolves.toBe(1n);

// we try to claim an extra `2` tokens
// this should faile bcause the max claimable is `3` and we have previously already claimed 2 tokens (one for ourselves, one for the other wallet)
// this should faile because the max claimable is `3` and we have previously already claimed 2 tokens (one for ourselves, one for the other wallet)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's still a typo in the comment: faile should be fail. The correction is important for maintaining documentation quality, especially since this PR is specifically focused on improving comment clarity.

Suggested change
// this should faile because the max claimable is `3` and we have previously already claimed 2 tokens (one for ourselves, one for the other wallet)
// this should fail because the max claimable is `3` and we have previously already claimed 2 tokens (one for ourselves, one for the other wallet)

Spotted by Diamond

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/thirdweb/src/extensions/erc721/drop721.test.ts (1)

293-293: Typo in comment: "faile" is misspelled
The comment still reads “faile” instead of “fail.” Please correct it for clarity.

Apply this diff:

- // this should faile because the max claimable is `3` and we have previously already claimed 2 tokens (one for ourselves, one for the other wallet)
+ // this should fail because the max claimable is `3` and we have previously already claimed 2 tokens (one for ourselves, one for the other wallet)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64ee04c and 8a8977f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/thirdweb/src/extensions/erc721/drop721.test.ts (1 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
packages SDK Involves changes to the thirdweb SDK
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant