Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Line 19 in 2d89d2d

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 2d89d2d

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 2d89d2d

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 2d89d2d

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 2d89d2d

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 2d89d2d

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 2d89d2d

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 2d89d2d

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 2d89d2d

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 2d89d2d

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 2d89d2d

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 2d89d2d

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 2d89d2d

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 2d89d2d

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 2d89d2d

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 2d89d2d

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 2d89d2d

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 2d89d2d

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 2d89d2d

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 2d89d2d

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 2d89d2d

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 2d89d2d

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 2d89d2d

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 2d89d2d

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 2d89d2d

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 2d89d2d

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 2d89d2d

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 2d89d2d

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 2d89d2d

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 2d89d2d

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 2d89d2d

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 2d89d2d

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 2d89d2d

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 2d89d2d

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 2d89d2d

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 2d89d2d

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 2d89d2d

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 2d89d2d

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 2d89d2d

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 2d89d2d

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 2d89d2d

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 2d89d2d

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 2d89d2d

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 2d89d2d

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 2d89d2d

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 2d89d2d

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 2d89d2d

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 2d89d2d

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 2d89d2d

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 2d89d2d

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 2d89d2d

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 2d89d2d

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 2d89d2d

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 2d89d2d

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 2d89d2d

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 2d89d2d

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 2d89d2d

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 2d89d2d

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 2d89d2d

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 2d89d2d

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 2d89d2d

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 2d89d2d

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 2d89d2d

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 2d89d2d

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 2d89d2d

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 2d89d2d

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 2d89d2d

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 2d89d2d

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 2d89d2d

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 2d89d2d

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 2d89d2d

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 2d89d2d

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 2d89d2d

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 2d89d2d

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 2d89d2d

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 2d89d2d

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-04T01:30:03Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/464/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in fcde252

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in fcde252

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in fcde252

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in fcde252

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in fcde252

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in fcde252

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in fcde252

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in fcde252

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in fcde252

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in fcde252

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in fcde252

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in fcde252

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in fcde252

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in fcde252

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in fcde252

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in fcde252

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in fcde252

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in fcde252

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in fcde252

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in fcde252

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in fcde252

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in fcde252

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in fcde252

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in fcde252

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in fcde252

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in fcde252

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in fcde252

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in fcde252

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in fcde252

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in fcde252

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in fcde252

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in fcde252

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in fcde252

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in fcde252

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in fcde252

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in fcde252

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in fcde252

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in fcde252

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in fcde252

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in fcde252

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in fcde252

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in fcde252

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in fcde252

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in fcde252

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in fcde252

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in fcde252

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in fcde252

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in fcde252

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in fcde252

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in fcde252

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in fcde252

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in fcde252

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in fcde252

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in fcde252

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in fcde252

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in fcde252

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in fcde252

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in fcde252

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in fcde252

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in fcde252

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in fcde252

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in fcde252

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in fcde252

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in fcde252

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in fcde252

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in fcde252

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in fcde252

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in fcde252

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in fcde252

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in fcde252

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in fcde252

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in fcde252

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in fcde252

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in fcde252

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in fcde252

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in fcde252

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-04T21:47:51Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/464/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 40e5c8e

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 40e5c8e

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 40e5c8e

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 40e5c8e

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 40e5c8e

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 40e5c8e

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 40e5c8e

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 40e5c8e

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 40e5c8e

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 40e5c8e

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 40e5c8e

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 40e5c8e

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 40e5c8e

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 40e5c8e

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 40e5c8e

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 40e5c8e

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 40e5c8e

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 40e5c8e

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 40e5c8e

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 40e5c8e

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 40e5c8e

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 40e5c8e

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 40e5c8e

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 40e5c8e

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 40e5c8e

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 40e5c8e

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 40e5c8e

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 40e5c8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 40e5c8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 40e5c8e

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 40e5c8e

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 40e5c8e

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 40e5c8e

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 40e5c8e

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 40e5c8e

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 40e5c8e

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 40e5c8e

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 40e5c8e

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 40e5c8e

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 40e5c8e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 40e5c8e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 40e5c8e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 40e5c8e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 40e5c8e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 40e5c8e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 40e5c8e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 40e5c8e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 40e5c8e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 40e5c8e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 40e5c8e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 40e5c8e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 40e5c8e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 40e5c8e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 40e5c8e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 40e5c8e

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 40e5c8e

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 40e5c8e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 40e5c8e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 40e5c8e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 40e5c8e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 40e5c8e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 40e5c8e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 40e5c8e

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 40e5c8e

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 40e5c8e

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 40e5c8e

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 40e5c8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 40e5c8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 40e5c8e

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 40e5c8e

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 40e5c8e

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 40e5c8e

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 40e5c8e

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 40e5c8e

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 40e5c8e

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 40e5c8e

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-05T12:52:47Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/464/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 200c33f

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 200c33f

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 200c33f

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 200c33f

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 200c33f

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 200c33f

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 200c33f

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 200c33f

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 200c33f

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 200c33f

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 200c33f

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 200c33f

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 200c33f

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 200c33f

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 200c33f

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 200c33f

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 200c33f

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 200c33f

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 200c33f

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 200c33f

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 200c33f

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 200c33f

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 200c33f

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 200c33f

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 200c33f

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 200c33f

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 200c33f

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 200c33f

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 200c33f

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 200c33f

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 200c33f

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 200c33f

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 200c33f

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 200c33f

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 200c33f

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 200c33f

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 200c33f

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 200c33f

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 200c33f

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 200c33f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 200c33f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 200c33f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 200c33f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 200c33f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 200c33f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 200c33f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 200c33f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 200c33f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 200c33f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 200c33f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 200c33f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 200c33f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 200c33f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 200c33f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 200c33f

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 200c33f

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 200c33f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 200c33f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 200c33f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 200c33f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 200c33f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 200c33f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 200c33f

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 200c33f

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 200c33f

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 200c33f

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 200c33f

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 200c33f

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 200c33f

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 200c33f

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 200c33f

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 200c33f

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 200c33f

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 200c33f

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 200c33f

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 200c33f

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-09T13:01:10Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/464/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in faf3577

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in faf3577

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in faf3577

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in faf3577

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in faf3577

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in faf3577

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in faf3577

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in faf3577

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in faf3577

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in faf3577

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in faf3577

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in faf3577

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in faf3577

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in faf3577

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in faf3577

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in faf3577

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in faf3577

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in faf3577

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in faf3577

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in faf3577

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in faf3577

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in faf3577

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in faf3577

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in faf3577

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in faf3577

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in faf3577

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in faf3577

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in faf3577

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in faf3577

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in faf3577

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in faf3577

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in faf3577

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in faf3577

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in faf3577

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in faf3577

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in faf3577

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in faf3577

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in faf3577

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in faf3577

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in faf3577

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in faf3577

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in faf3577

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in faf3577

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in faf3577

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in faf3577

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in faf3577

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in faf3577

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in faf3577

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in faf3577

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in faf3577

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in faf3577

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in faf3577

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in faf3577

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in faf3577

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in faf3577

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in faf3577

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in faf3577

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in faf3577

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in faf3577

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in faf3577

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in faf3577

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in faf3577

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in faf3577

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in faf3577

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in faf3577

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in faf3577

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in faf3577

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in faf3577

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in faf3577

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in faf3577

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in faf3577

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in faf3577

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in faf3577

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in faf3577

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in faf3577

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in faf3577

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-10T12:35:55Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/464/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in be725e7

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in be725e7

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in be725e7

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in be725e7

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in be725e7

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in be725e7

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in be725e7

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in be725e7

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in be725e7

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in be725e7

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in be725e7

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in be725e7

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in be725e7

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in be725e7

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in be725e7

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in be725e7

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in be725e7

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in be725e7

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in be725e7

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in be725e7

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in be725e7

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in be725e7

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in be725e7

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in be725e7

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in be725e7

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in be725e7

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in be725e7

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in be725e7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in be725e7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in be725e7

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in be725e7

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in be725e7

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in be725e7

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in be725e7

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in be725e7

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in be725e7

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in be725e7

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in be725e7

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in be725e7

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in be725e7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in be725e7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in be725e7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in be725e7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in be725e7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in be725e7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in be725e7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in be725e7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in be725e7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in be725e7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in be725e7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in be725e7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in be725e7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in be725e7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in be725e7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in be725e7

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in be725e7

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in be725e7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in be725e7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in be725e7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in be725e7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in be725e7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in be725e7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in be725e7

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in be725e7

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in be725e7

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in be725e7

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in be725e7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in be725e7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in be725e7

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in be725e7

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in be725e7

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in be725e7

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in be725e7

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in be725e7

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in be725e7

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in be725e7

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-11T13:06:15Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/464/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in d68e15f

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in d68e15f

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in d68e15f

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in d68e15f

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in d68e15f

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in d68e15f

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in d68e15f

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in d68e15f

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in d68e15f

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in d68e15f

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in d68e15f

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in d68e15f

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in d68e15f

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in d68e15f

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in d68e15f

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in d68e15f

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in d68e15f

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in d68e15f

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in d68e15f

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in d68e15f

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in d68e15f

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in d68e15f

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in d68e15f

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in d68e15f

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in d68e15f

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in d68e15f

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in d68e15f

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in d68e15f

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in d68e15f

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d68e15f

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in d68e15f

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d68e15f

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in d68e15f

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in d68e15f

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d68e15f

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in d68e15f

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in d68e15f

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in d68e15f

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in d68e15f

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in d68e15f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d68e15f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in d68e15f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in d68e15f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d68e15f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d68e15f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d68e15f

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d68e15f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d68e15f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d68e15f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in d68e15f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d68e15f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in d68e15f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in d68e15f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d68e15f

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in d68e15f

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d68e15f

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in d68e15f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d68e15f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in d68e15f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in d68e15f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d68e15f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in d68e15f

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in d68e15f

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in d68e15f

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in d68e15f

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in d68e15f

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in d68e15f

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in d68e15f

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d68e15f

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in d68e15f

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d68e15f

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in d68e15f

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in d68e15f

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d68e15f

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in d68e15f

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in d68e15f

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-12T00:23:26Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/464/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 22d815e

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 22d815e

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 22d815e

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 22d815e

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 22d815e

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 22d815e

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 22d815e

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 22d815e

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 22d815e

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 22d815e

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 22d815e

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 22d815e

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 22d815e

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 22d815e

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 22d815e

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 22d815e

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 22d815e

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 22d815e

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 22d815e

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 22d815e

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 22d815e

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 22d815e

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 22d815e

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 22d815e

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 22d815e

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 22d815e

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 22d815e

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 22d815e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 22d815e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 22d815e

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 22d815e

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 22d815e

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 22d815e

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 22d815e

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 22d815e

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 22d815e

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 22d815e

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 22d815e

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 22d815e

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 22d815e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 22d815e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 22d815e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 22d815e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 22d815e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 22d815e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 22d815e

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 22d815e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 22d815e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 22d815e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 22d815e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 22d815e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 22d815e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 22d815e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 22d815e

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 22d815e

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 22d815e

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 22d815e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 22d815e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 22d815e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 22d815e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 22d815e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 22d815e

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 22d815e

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 22d815e

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 22d815e

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 22d815e

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 22d815e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 22d815e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 22d815e

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 22d815e

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 22d815e

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 22d815e

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 22d815e

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 22d815e

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 22d815e

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 22d815e

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-23T20:57:59Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/464/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in a75d3c7

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in a75d3c7

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in a75d3c7

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in a75d3c7

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in a75d3c7

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in a75d3c7

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in a75d3c7

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in a75d3c7

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in a75d3c7

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in a75d3c7

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in a75d3c7

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in a75d3c7

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in a75d3c7

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in a75d3c7

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in a75d3c7

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in a75d3c7

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in a75d3c7

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in a75d3c7

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in a75d3c7

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in a75d3c7

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in a75d3c7

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in a75d3c7

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in a75d3c7

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in a75d3c7

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in a75d3c7

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in a75d3c7

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in a75d3c7

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in a75d3c7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in a75d3c7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in a75d3c7

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in a75d3c7

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in a75d3c7

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in a75d3c7

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in a75d3c7

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in a75d3c7

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in a75d3c7

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in a75d3c7

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in a75d3c7

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in a75d3c7

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in a75d3c7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in a75d3c7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in a75d3c7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in a75d3c7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in a75d3c7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in a75d3c7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in a75d3c7

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in a75d3c7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in a75d3c7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in a75d3c7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in a75d3c7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in a75d3c7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in a75d3c7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in a75d3c7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in a75d3c7

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in a75d3c7

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in a75d3c7

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in a75d3c7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in a75d3c7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in a75d3c7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in a75d3c7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in a75d3c7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in a75d3c7

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in a75d3c7

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in a75d3c7

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in a75d3c7

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in a75d3c7

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in a75d3c7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in a75d3c7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in a75d3c7

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in a75d3c7

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in a75d3c7

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in a75d3c7

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in a75d3c7

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in a75d3c7

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in a75d3c7

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in a75d3c7

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-24T18:17:46Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/464/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 3a1fb93

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 3a1fb93

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 3a1fb93

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 3a1fb93

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 3a1fb93

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 3a1fb93

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 3a1fb93

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 3a1fb93

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 3a1fb93

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 3a1fb93

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 3a1fb93

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 3a1fb93

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 3a1fb93

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 3a1fb93

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 3a1fb93

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 3a1fb93

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 3a1fb93

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 3a1fb93

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 3a1fb93

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 3a1fb93

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 3a1fb93

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 3a1fb93

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 3a1fb93

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 3a1fb93

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 3a1fb93

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 3a1fb93

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 3a1fb93

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 3a1fb93

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 3a1fb93

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3a1fb93

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 3a1fb93

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3a1fb93

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 3a1fb93

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 3a1fb93

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3a1fb93

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 3a1fb93

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 3a1fb93

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 3a1fb93

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 3a1fb93

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 3a1fb93

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3a1fb93

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 3a1fb93

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 3a1fb93

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3a1fb93

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3a1fb93

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3a1fb93

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3a1fb93

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3a1fb93

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3a1fb93

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 3a1fb93

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3a1fb93

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 3a1fb93

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 3a1fb93

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3a1fb93

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 3a1fb93

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3a1fb93

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 3a1fb93

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3a1fb93

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 3a1fb93

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 3a1fb93

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3a1fb93

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 3a1fb93

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 3a1fb93

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 3a1fb93

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 3a1fb93

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 3a1fb93

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 3a1fb93

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 3a1fb93

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3a1fb93

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 3a1fb93

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3a1fb93

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 3a1fb93

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 3a1fb93

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3a1fb93

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 3a1fb93

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 3a1fb93

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Bumps [@actions/github](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/tree/HEAD/packages/github) from 2.2.0 to 3.0.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/blob/master/packages/github/RELEASES.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/commits/HEAD/packages/github) Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <[email protected]>

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-24T23:57:54Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/464/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in d557d71

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in d557d71

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in d557d71

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in d557d71

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in d557d71

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in d557d71

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in d557d71

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in d557d71

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in d557d71

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in d557d71

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in d557d71

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in d557d71

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in d557d71

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in d557d71

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in d557d71

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in d557d71

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in d557d71

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in d557d71

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in d557d71

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in d557d71

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in d557d71

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in d557d71

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in d557d71

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in d557d71

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in d557d71

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in d557d71

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in d557d71

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in d557d71

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in d557d71

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d557d71

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in d557d71

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d557d71

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in d557d71

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in d557d71

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d557d71

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in d557d71

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in d557d71

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in d557d71

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in d557d71

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in d557d71

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d557d71

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in d557d71

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in d557d71

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d557d71

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d557d71

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d557d71

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d557d71

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d557d71

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d557d71

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in d557d71

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d557d71

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in d557d71

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in d557d71

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d557d71

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in d557d71

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d557d71

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in d557d71

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d557d71

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in d557d71

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in d557d71

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d557d71

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in d557d71

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in d557d71

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in d557d71

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in d557d71

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in d557d71

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in d557d71

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in d557d71

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d557d71

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in d557d71

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d557d71

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in d557d71

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in d557d71

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d557d71

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in d557d71

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md