Skip to content

Fix specific resource#278

Open
duncdrum wants to merge 2 commits into
tify-iiif-viewer:mainfrom
duncdrum:fix-specificResource
Open

Fix specific resource#278
duncdrum wants to merge 2 commits into
tify-iiif-viewer:mainfrom
duncdrum:fix-specificResource

Conversation

@duncdrum
Copy link
Copy Markdown

I stumbled across this during client work. All viewer tested struggled with this type of annotation in some form or the other.

closes #277

@duncdrum duncdrum force-pushed the fix-specificResource branch from c46850d to 2b91267 Compare December 23, 2025 10:29
@t11r
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

t11r commented Jan 12, 2026

Thanks a lot, @duncdrum! Since this is a larger change and may be affected by the @iiif/parser package, which we are about to update, this may take some time to review. Thank you for your patience, I will keep you updated.

@duncdrum
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@t11r Any reason why you wouldn't approve a CI run?

While I did run the tests locally, I consider ci to be the source of truth. So I m curious to see if the changes actually have side effects.

mock manifest simulates open-fold -single page interlinking
@t11r t11r force-pushed the fix-specificResource branch from 2b91267 to 5b8b0da Compare January 23, 2026 19:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SpecificResource annotation bodies incorrectly trigger fetch requests

2 participants