Fix backwards compatible execution by allowing additional properties to passthrough #2327
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe update modifies schema definitions in the codebase by adding the Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/core/src/v3/schemas/common.ts (2)
313-316: Redundant.passthrough()ontask
TaskRunExecutionTaskhasn’t been marked as.strict()or.strip(), so its default behaviour already accepts and returns unknown keys.
Keeping the call is harmless and documents intent, but it doesn’t change runtime behaviour; it only adds noise and slightly widens the inferred type to include an index signature.If the goal is clarity, consider either:
- Removing the extra call, or
- Adding a brief note that the explicit
.passthrough()is purely documentary.
330-333: Same redundancy forattemptExactly the same observation applies here:
TaskRunExecutionAttemptalready passes through unknown keys by default, so the explicit.passthrough()is functionally no-op.It’s fine to leave for documentation, but worth knowing that it’s not required.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/core/src/v3/schemas/common.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream, etc. instead of Node.js specific code
For TypeScript, we usually use types over interfaces
Avoid enums
No default exports, use function declarations
Files:
packages/core/src/v3/schemas/common.ts
{packages/core,apps/webapp}/**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
We use zod a lot in packages/core and in the webapp
Files:
packages/core/src/v3/schemas/common.ts
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to **/trigger/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : When implementing schema tasks, use `schemaTask` from `@trigger.dev/sdk/v3` and validate payloads as shown.
packages/core/src/v3/schemas/common.ts (8)
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to /trigger//*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : When implementing schema tasks, use schemaTask from @trigger.dev/sdk/v3 and validate payloads as shown.
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to /trigger//*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : Tasks must be exported, even subtasks in the same file.
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to /trigger//*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : ALWAYS generate Trigger.dev tasks using the task function from @trigger.dev/sdk/v3 and export them as shown in the correct pattern.
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to /trigger//*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : When using metadata in tasks, use the metadata API as shown, and only inside run functions or task lifecycle hooks.
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to /trigger//*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : If you are able to generate an example payload for a task, do so.
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to /trigger//*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : When implementing scheduled (cron) tasks, use schedules.task from @trigger.dev/sdk/v3 and follow the shown patterns.
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to /trigger//*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : The run function contains your task logic in Trigger.dev tasks.
Learnt from: CR
PR: triggerdotdev/trigger.dev#0
File: .cursor/rules/writing-tasks.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T17:50:25.014Z
Learning: Applies to /trigger//*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : When triggering a task from backend code, use tasks.trigger, tasks.batchTrigger, or tasks.triggerAndPoll as shown in the examples.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (25)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (10, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (9, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 10)
- GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
No description provided.