Detailed the additional arguments available in processValue with property value presets #7403
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…erty value presets.
eshanrnh
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR, @AndyButland 🙌 The PR looks great. We will merge it on October 02 💪
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📋 Description
Documents additional parameters available when handling property value presets.
📎 Related Issues (if applicable)
umbraco/Umbraco-CMS#20111
✅ Contributor Checklist
I've followed the Umbraco Documentation Style Guide and can confirm that:
Product & Version (if relevant)
CMS 16.3
Deadline (if relevant)
Should go live on 2nd October please, to coincide with the 16.3 release candidate.